2022
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent‐recorded videos of infant spontaneous movement: Comparisons at 3–4 months and relationships with 2‐year developmental outcomes in extremely preterm, extremely low birthweight and term‐born infants

Abstract: Background: Infants born extremely preterm (EP, <28-week gestational age) or extremely low birthweight (ELBW, <1000 g) are at risk of developmental delay and cerebral palsy (CP). The General Movements Assessment (GMA) and its extension, the Motor Optimality Score, revised (MOS-R) (assesses movement patterns and posture), may help to identify early delays.Objectives: To compare differences in the MOS-R scored from parent-recorded videos between infants born EP/ELBW and term-born infants, to determine relationsh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the Rasch model assume, Infant with lower developmental level tend to achieve less growth milestones. This can be explained that infant with developmental delay caused by various factors (Extremely preterm, extremely low birthweight) present much lower developmental level than those born at term in gross motor, ne motor, cognition, and language domains(Kwong et al, 2022).The person and item separation index were within the recommended range (> 2), hence we suggest that the CDSC items were enough to differentiate person into at least 12 distinct development level. Further, the person and item reliability were within satisfactory range as well(> 0.8), and the result supports that the CDSC is reliable enough if the same testing items were applied on different sample with the same participants characteristic or our study sample received another item set that belongs to the CDSC test structure.In brief, the CDSC has demonstrated good psychometric properties in our Rasch Model analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As the Rasch model assume, Infant with lower developmental level tend to achieve less growth milestones. This can be explained that infant with developmental delay caused by various factors (Extremely preterm, extremely low birthweight) present much lower developmental level than those born at term in gross motor, ne motor, cognition, and language domains(Kwong et al, 2022).The person and item separation index were within the recommended range (> 2), hence we suggest that the CDSC items were enough to differentiate person into at least 12 distinct development level. Further, the person and item reliability were within satisfactory range as well(> 0.8), and the result supports that the CDSC is reliable enough if the same testing items were applied on different sample with the same participants characteristic or our study sample received another item set that belongs to the CDSC test structure.In brief, the CDSC has demonstrated good psychometric properties in our Rasch Model analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We found that this effect was largely dependent on preterm birth, although infants with abnormal GMA predictions scored lower on average regardless of birth cohort. The association between preterm birth and poor neurodevelopmental outcomes is well established 8,13 and this finding reflects the relatively lower predictive validity of GMA ratings, and therefore model predictions, for motor and cognitive outcomes at 2 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These 'fidgety movements' are typically recognised using a trained assessor's gestalt perception, while the infant is lying awake on their back with no direct handling or interaction 11 . This assessment is best completed from video recordings of the infant and has high predictive validity for neurodevelopmental outcomes and excellent inter-rater reliability 9,12,13 . The GMA when used during the 'fidgety period' has the potential to be an important screening tool in the diagnosis of CP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GM assessment involves the observation of an infant's movement while lying on their back for 3–5 min from birth to 20 weeks of age (corrected for preterm delivery). Kwong et al 7 found that the Motor Optimality Score from the GM assessment administered at 3–4 months corrected age significantly predicted cognitive, language and motor development at 2 years. Infant movements were recorded by parents at home using an app on their smartphones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%