2013
DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2013.764826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent-Reported Executive Functioning in Postinstitutionalized Children: A Follow-Up Study

Abstract: Objective This study compared parent-rated executive functioning (EF) in 6- to 18-year-old children adopted from psychosocially depriving institutions to that in children adopted from severely or “globally” depriving institutions. Individual continuity in EF over two years was examined in children adopted from psychosocially depriving institutions. Method There were 471 children adopted from psychosocially depriving Russian institutions which provided adequate physical resources but failed to provide a consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems with executive function have been reported in adopted children on performance-based tests (Colvert et al, 2008;Hostinar, Stellern, Schaefer, Carlson, & Gunnar, 2012) and parent ratings on the BRIEF (Merz & McCall, 2011;Merz, McCall, & Groza, 2013). Although the precise reason for these findings remains unclear, early psychosocial deprivation, lower quality of physical/social care in institutions, and genetic influences have all been suggested as playing a role (Hostinar et al, 2012;Leve et al, 2013;Merz & McCall, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Problems with executive function have been reported in adopted children on performance-based tests (Colvert et al, 2008;Hostinar, Stellern, Schaefer, Carlson, & Gunnar, 2012) and parent ratings on the BRIEF (Merz & McCall, 2011;Merz, McCall, & Groza, 2013). Although the precise reason for these findings remains unclear, early psychosocial deprivation, lower quality of physical/social care in institutions, and genetic influences have all been suggested as playing a role (Hostinar et al, 2012;Leve et al, 2013;Merz & McCall, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The two most comprehensive sets of longitudinal studies (English and Romanian Adoptees studies, i.e., Kreppner et al, 2001Kreppner et al, , 2010Stevens et al, 2008; and Canadian studies, i.e., Audet & Le Mare, 2010) have focused only on children adopted from Romania as infants and toddlers. Using research findings derived from children who experienced profound deprivation in Romania to draw conclusions about children adopted internationally from other countries is difficult as several studies suggest that outcomes differ when samples include children adopted from orphanages that have less severe deprivation (Gunnar et al, 2007;Merz & McCall, 2010, Merz et al, 2013. Additionally, focusing only on children adopted as infants and toddlers makes it difficult to draw conclusions about children adopted at older ages.…”
Section: Gaps In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Also, multiple studies have shown that boys are at increased risk for developing inattentive=overactive behaviors after institutional care (Gunnar et al, 2012;Lindblad et al, 2010;Miller, Chan, Tirella, & Perrin, 2009;Roy et al, 2004;Sonuga-Barke & Rubia, 2008;Wiik et al, 2011), and in longitudinal studies, boys have shown less recovery of inattentive=overac-tive behaviors over time (Stevens et al, 2008). However, other research has suggested that gender is not a significant predictor related to attention and hyperactivity (Abrines et al, 2012;Audet & Le Mare, 2010;BarconsCastel et al, 2011;Colvert, Rutter, Kreppner, et al, 2008;Merz & McCall, 2010;Merz et al, 2013). In contrast, child-specific factors including birth weight and prenatal risk factors seem largely unrelated to inattentive= overactive behaviors in internationally adopted children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations