2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental age as a risk factor for non-syndromic oral clefts: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
6
70
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to maternal age as a risk factor for the occurrence of NSCL/P, we adopted the categories (maternal age <35, 36-39 and ≥40 years) recently cited in a meta-analysis study 18 . In the present study, we found no association between maternal age and clefts (p=0.747).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With respect to maternal age as a risk factor for the occurrence of NSCL/P, we adopted the categories (maternal age <35, 36-39 and ≥40 years) recently cited in a meta-analysis study 18 . In the present study, we found no association between maternal age and clefts (p=0.747).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were carefully examined and screened for the presence of associated anomalies or syndromes by a team of specialists from each center, and the clefts were classified with the incisive foramen as reference 8 . Paternal ages were classified into the following groups: maternal age <35, 36-39, and ≥40 years; paternal age <39 and ≥40 years 18 . Patients with congenital malformations (other than oral cleft), history of consanguinity or history of familial NSCL/P were not included in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mothers between 35 and 39 were also at statistically higher risk of generating a child with CP than those between 20 and 29 years. [6] Bille et al [28] also observed an association between advanced maternal and paternal age and increased the risk of birth with CL/P, although only advanced paternal age has been associated with an increased risk of CP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[4] Maternal exposure to environmental factors during the embryonic development period may increase the likelihood of an embryo to develop structural anomalies that include cleft lip and palate. [5] In a recent systematic review, 14 different classifications were found for cleft lip and palate, and the most widely used classification divides clefts into two groups, cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and cleft palate (CP), [6] as they are etiologically distinct, both embryologically as epidemiologically.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%