1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990129)82:3<206::aid-ajmg2>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental attitudes regarding carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome

Abstract: Sixty-five parents of individuals affected by fragile X syndrome who attended the National Fragile X Conference in Portland, Oregon (1996), were asked to complete a survey assessing parental level of concern about carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome. All subjects completed a 15-item paper and pencil Likert response scale measure that was developed specifically for this study. The items included parental rights and duties, psychological adjustment, adaptation, discrimination, harm, childb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4]10,30 The finding that some parents persist with requests and receive testing is important because previous studies have not distinguished between carrier testing driven by parental requests and medical recommendations. 22,31,32 This study identified surprising differences in the reported frequency of parental requests for carrier testing in their children. The interview process uncovered variation in what counts as a request for testing, with one interpretation being that a simple expression of interest constitutes a request and another being that only a more formal and specific request for carrier testing does so.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4]10,30 The finding that some parents persist with requests and receive testing is important because previous studies have not distinguished between carrier testing driven by parental requests and medical recommendations. 22,31,32 This study identified surprising differences in the reported frequency of parental requests for carrier testing in their children. The interview process uncovered variation in what counts as a request for testing, with one interpretation being that a simple expression of interest constitutes a request and another being that only a more formal and specific request for carrier testing does so.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Previously, the decision about genetic testing of minors has been made by the parents (12,13). Since 1992 in Finland, the child has a right to participate in the decisionmaking at as early an age as possible, and the opinion of children aged Ն12 years must be heard (14).…”
Section: Research Design Andmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…20 Although there has been some exploration of parents' perspectives on receiving carrier results as an incidental finding from newborn screening, [21][22][23] few studies have explored parents' perspectives on carrier testing for their other children following the diagnosis of an affected child. 1,[17][18][19] Although existing studies provide further evidence that some unaffected siblings receive carrier testing, little research has explored parents' experiences with the request-to-test process, the impact of knowing a child's carrier status, and whether parents communicate carrier information to their children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…9,12 In some cases, carrier testing is carried out for the sibling of an affected child despite the recommendations. 1,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Studies reporting carrier-testing practices of health professionals indicate that genetic health professionals are willing to facilitate carrier testing for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions in unaffected children to varying degrees. [13][14][15][16]20 For example, in an interview-based study of 17 key informant genetic health professionals in Australia, we found that all our participants initially recommended against carrier testing in children following parental requests, with some preemptively discussing it as a test they generally do not perform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%