2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00772.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental behaviours, but not parental smoking, influence current smoking and smoking susceptibility among 14 and 15 year‐old children

Abstract: Implications:The study provides evidence to inform the development of parentfocused interventions to reduce the risk of smoking initiation by children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies' populations have different age distributions and come from different countries with very different cultural backgrounds, thus, it is difficult to draw conclusions about gender and age in general. The findings with regard to pocket money are also consistent with other studies [42]. With regard to the influence of e-cigarettes, since this study is cross-sectional, it is not possible to determine whether susceptibility to tobacco smoking arose after the use of e-cigarettes or pre-existed.…”
Section: Main Findings and Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These studies' populations have different age distributions and come from different countries with very different cultural backgrounds, thus, it is difficult to draw conclusions about gender and age in general. The findings with regard to pocket money are also consistent with other studies [42]. With regard to the influence of e-cigarettes, since this study is cross-sectional, it is not possible to determine whether susceptibility to tobacco smoking arose after the use of e-cigarettes or pre-existed.…”
Section: Main Findings and Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The finding in the current study may also partially explain why susceptibility-to-smoking increases in inverse proportion to the level of parental monitoring exercised, that is, as monitoring decreases with a growing child susceptibility increases (Carvajal et al, 2004;Waa et al, 2011;Ozturk et al, 2013). This lack of parental monitoring has also been shown to increase the risk of susceptibility-to-smoking in a previous study (Forrester et al, 2007;Jeganathan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This was particularly the case if parents were non-smokers but appeared to hold, even if parents smoked. Several robust epidemiological studies have upheld the hypothesis that anti-smoking socialisation is protective against youth smoking [50-52]. Further, in this study the effect of these parenting practices appeared to be influenced by the strength of family ties, suggesting an interaction between general and smoking-specific parenting practices, and highlighting the role of social bonding in influencing normative beliefs about smoking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%