Handbook of Parenting and Child Development Across the Lifespan 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94598-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Cognitions: Relations to Parenting and Child Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Dual-process models of cognition (Andersen, Moskowitz, Blair, & Nosek, 2007) extend this model by suggesting that for many parents, their initial, automatic attributions may be child-blaming in response to child misbehaviour. However, top-down information processing abilities (i.e., EFs) are proposed to allow parents to override these initial negative attributions, if they are motivated to do so, by considering mitigating information (e.g., the child is tired) or their own parenting goals (e.g., parental kindness is important; Johnston, Park, & Miller, 2019). These models imply an effortful and conscious processing of information that is subject to disruption by the experience of stress (e.g., Pinderhughes, Dodge, Bates, Pettit, & Zelli, 2000;Wang, Deater-Deckard, & Bell, 2013) or poor EF skills (e.g., Azar, McGuier, Miller, Hernandez-Mekonnen, & Johnson, 2017).…”
Section: Parental Cognitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-process models of cognition (Andersen, Moskowitz, Blair, & Nosek, 2007) extend this model by suggesting that for many parents, their initial, automatic attributions may be child-blaming in response to child misbehaviour. However, top-down information processing abilities (i.e., EFs) are proposed to allow parents to override these initial negative attributions, if they are motivated to do so, by considering mitigating information (e.g., the child is tired) or their own parenting goals (e.g., parental kindness is important; Johnston, Park, & Miller, 2019). These models imply an effortful and conscious processing of information that is subject to disruption by the experience of stress (e.g., Pinderhughes, Dodge, Bates, Pettit, & Zelli, 2000;Wang, Deater-Deckard, & Bell, 2013) or poor EF skills (e.g., Azar, McGuier, Miller, Hernandez-Mekonnen, & Johnson, 2017).…”
Section: Parental Cognitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta medida es clave para conocer las autoevaluaciones de las madres, padres o cuidadores, es decir, las ideas o creencias que tienen sobre su rol parental fuertemente influidas por el contexto sociocultural de la familia (Bornstein et al, 1998). Asimismo, su medición puede contribuir a la comprensión de los procesos perceptuales y cogniciones que podrían mediar la relación parentofilial, ya que estos impactarían en las decisiones y conductas parentales (Johnston et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The complex links between caregiver cognitions and well‐being, their parenting behavior, and child outcomes is described in different theoretical frameworks such as the multiple determinants of parenting (Belsky & Jaffee, 2006), family stress theory (Hill, 1958), and parental self‐efficacy theory (Bandura & Adams, 1977). Cognitions guide parents' processing of information about their children, their children's behavior, and their role as parents to inform their decisions on how to act (Johnston et al, 2018). Indeed, negative cognitions have, for example, been found to predict coercive parenting behavior and subsequently disruptive child behavior (Smith et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations For and Empirical Evidence Of The Immentioning
confidence: 99%