2014
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental decision-making in uptake of the MMR vaccination: a systematic review of qualitative literature

Abstract: Policymakers need to adapt information provided to address these concerns. Future research should focus more on distinguishing between accepters and rejecters to determine which factors can alter outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this review intentionally focused on parental attitudes toward measles vaccines in light of the current measles crisis in Europe, many findings were paralleled in systematic reviews on attitudes regarding general childhood vaccines in Europe [42,43]. The main difference was the unique fear of MMR and autism.…”
Section: Conveniencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this review intentionally focused on parental attitudes toward measles vaccines in light of the current measles crisis in Europe, many findings were paralleled in systematic reviews on attitudes regarding general childhood vaccines in Europe [42,43]. The main difference was the unique fear of MMR and autism.…”
Section: Conveniencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Despite their proven effectiveness, some parents continue to have multiple concerns and misperceptions regarding childhood vaccinations, even in communities with high vaccination rates. 4,5 Similarly, healthcare workers (HCW) have lingering misconceptions of vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases and are one of the major causes for reduced uptake of recommended vaccines. 6 This lack of confidence contributes to the occurrence of vaccine hesitancy, threatening the effectiveness of vaccination programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary gave birth to modern clinical governance4 and opened the debate on the need to protect whistle-blowers 5. The Alder Hey organ retention affair6 led to a major rethink about the meaning and process of consent, and the anti-MMR vaccine campaign raised questions about trust and the presentation of information to the wider public 7. However, although children were at the centre of these cases, for the most part paediatricians and paediatric care were not the subject of criticism.…”
Section: Learning From Previous Paediatric Service Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%