2011
DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental risk factors and anorectal malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundAnorectal malformations (ARM) are rare forms of congenital uro-rectal anomalies with largely unknown causes. Besides genetic factors, prenatal exposures of the parents to nicotine, alcohol, caffeine, illicit drugs, occupational hazards, overweight/obesity and diabetes mellitus are suspected as environmental risk factors.MethodsRelevant studies published until August 2010 were identified through systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane Library databases. Furthermore, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
66
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact genetics, perhaps in combination with environmental facts, remain ill defined [19]. Environmental studies have implicated paternal cigarette smoking and exhaust fume exposure as well as maternal obesity and diabetes as possible risk factors [20][21][22]. In addition, maternal exposure to industrial cleaning agents, multivitamin use and first trimester pyrexia have been implicated, although some of these findings could not be replicated in follow-up studies [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact genetics, perhaps in combination with environmental facts, remain ill defined [19]. Environmental studies have implicated paternal cigarette smoking and exhaust fume exposure as well as maternal obesity and diabetes as possible risk factors [20][21][22]. In addition, maternal exposure to industrial cleaning agents, multivitamin use and first trimester pyrexia have been implicated, although some of these findings could not be replicated in follow-up studies [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. Lee et al, 2009; Pang et al, 2003; Vine, 1996) suggesting smoke-induced genetic or epigenetic changes occur in sperm that are transmitted to offspring. Additionally, children of men who smoke are at increased risk for childhood cancers, asthma (Svanes et al, 2016) and birth defects including cleft palate, urethral stenosis, hydrocephalus (Savitz et al, 1991), congenital heart disease, cardiovascular anomalies (Cresci et al, 2011) anorectal malformations (Zwink et al, 2011), spina bifida (Zhang et al, 1992), and reduced kidney volume (Kooijman et al, 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, smoking has damaging effect on DNA [14][16], and the DNA of spermatozoa has been reported to be much more sensitive to damage than DNA of oocytes [17], [18]. Paternal smoking has been reported to cause DNA adducts in embryos [19] of the same type found in sperm of smoking men [20], DNA breaks in cord blood of the offspring [21], and also seems associated with; lower pregnancy rates at assisted reproduction [22], pregnancy loss [23], [24], malformations [25][30] and cancer [31][36] as well as with reduced birth weight [37] in the offspring. Further, DNA mutations in mice, caused by general air pollution is reported to be inherited with predominance through the paternal germ line [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%