2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parents’ perceptions of the family climate for road safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a relevant set of positive associations between knowledge of traffic rules, positive attitudes towards road safety, and risk perception suggests the need for strengthening these elements in road safety education interventions, especially when considering their proven association to further risky/safe road behaviors [19]. Furthermore, the observed road behaviors had a correlation with the self-reported risky behaviors of participants in accordance with some studies supporting the influence of observed road behavior on the one performed by children and young road users [32,39,40]. However, we must face the rise of two difficult issues regarding this point: First, that we used a self-report measure for risky road behaviors (see Section 4.1), and second, that the observed behaviors constitute an aspect that is complementary to RSE in the acquisition of safe road habits, but at the same time, it does not fulfill the need for exerting major efforts in improving safe attitudes and risk perception of road users, considering that those factors also have an effect on the own road behavior [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, a relevant set of positive associations between knowledge of traffic rules, positive attitudes towards road safety, and risk perception suggests the need for strengthening these elements in road safety education interventions, especially when considering their proven association to further risky/safe road behaviors [19]. Furthermore, the observed road behaviors had a correlation with the self-reported risky behaviors of participants in accordance with some studies supporting the influence of observed road behavior on the one performed by children and young road users [32,39,40]. However, we must face the rise of two difficult issues regarding this point: First, that we used a self-report measure for risky road behaviors (see Section 4.1), and second, that the observed behaviors constitute an aspect that is complementary to RSE in the acquisition of safe road habits, but at the same time, it does not fulfill the need for exerting major efforts in improving safe attitudes and risk perception of road users, considering that those factors also have an effect on the own road behavior [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The first variable included in the path model was age. In this regard, former studies have already confirmed that age is usually related to a decreasing trend in the performance of risky behaviors when groups of young and adult road users are analyzed together [34,40,41]. Nevertheless, it is necessary to highlight that in our research the oldest age of the participants corresponded, overall, to teenagers for which we observed a rebound of the hazardous behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…First, a relevant set of positive associations between knowledge of traffic rules, positive attitudes towards road safety and risk perception suggests the need of strengthening these elements in road safety education interventions, especially when considering their proven association to further risky/safe road behaviors [19]. Furthermore, the observed road behaviors had a correlation with the self-reported risky behaviors of participants, in accordance with some studies supporting the influence of observed road behavior on the one performed by children and young road users [32,35,36]. However, we must face the rise of two difficult issues regarding this point: first, that we used a self-report measure for risky road behaviors (see Limitations), and second, that the observed behaviors constitute an aspect that is complementary to RSE in the acquisition of safe road habits, but at the same time it does not fulfill the need of exerting major efforts for improving safe attitudes and risk perception of road users, considering that those factors also have an effect on the own road behavior [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Subsequently, and as for the Structural Equation Model, obtained with good fit and significant paths in accordance with the theory, we will discuss the model's principal components and we will explain the paths basing our reasoning on the study variables: the first variable included in the path model was age. In this regard, former studies have already confirmed that age is usually related to a decreasing trend in the performance of risky behaviors, when groups of young and adult road users are analyzed together [34,36,37]. Nevertheless, it is necessary to highlight that in our research the oldest age of the participants corresponded -overall-to teenagers, in which we observed a rebound of the hazardous behavior; so, in our case, risky behaviors are more common among adolescent and young pedestrians [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…15 A road safety climate created by parents is crucial to the safe road use and driving of their children. 16 It is also shown that higher risky driving by parents was found to be positively related to higher risky driving by their male offspring. Moreover, parents' own personality, and especially one of the father, was associated with the male young drivers' risky driving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%