2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02319-4_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto-Based Multi-output Model Type Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main drawback of Sobol Indices is that many simulations are required. To overcome this problem the SUMO (Surrogate MOdeling) tool [22] of Ghent University is used to generate a Kriging based surrogate model. This model generates 12 (the number of variable parameters in Table 1) dimensional surfaces that define the correlation of the input variables in perspective to a damage criteria.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of Sobol Indices is that many simulations are required. To overcome this problem the SUMO (Surrogate MOdeling) tool [22] of Ghent University is used to generate a Kriging based surrogate model. This model generates 12 (the number of variable parameters in Table 1) dimensional surfaces that define the correlation of the input variables in perspective to a damage criteria.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Pareto based approach to multi-output modeling also allows integration with the automatic surrogate model type selection algorithm described in [39]. This enables automatic selection of the best model type (Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kriging, Support Vector Machine (SVM), ...) for each output without having to resort to multiple runs [36,37].…”
Section: Modeling Multiple Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use this example to briefly illustrate the automatic model type selection per output. For a more extensive example see [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%