2013
DOI: 10.1080/01630563.2013.812110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto-Fenchel ε-Subdifferential Composition Rule and ε-Efficiency

Abstract: We are mainly concerned in this article with a first rule for the efficient (Pareto) -subdifferential concerning the composition of two convex vector mappings taking values in finite or infinite-dimensional pre-ordered spaces. The obtained formula is exact and holds under MoreauRockafellar or Attouch-Brézis qualification conditions. In fact, beyond regularity, the rule would not be accurate without convex (Fenchel) -subdifferential of one of the two composed mappings. But also, suitable fields of variation for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept reduces to the well-known of (exact) Benson (C, ε)-proper solution of (P), denoted by Be ( f, S), whenever C = D\{0} or ε = 0 and cone C = D. Also, it is not difficult to prove that, under generalized convexity assumptions, the notion of Benson (q + D, ε)-proper solution of (P), for q / ∈ −D\{0}, coincides with the notion of properly ε-efficient solution with respect to q given by El Maghri in [22] (see [22, Section 2 and Theorem 3.1] and Theorems 2.4 and 2.5).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This concept reduces to the well-known of (exact) Benson (C, ε)-proper solution of (P), denoted by Be ( f, S), whenever C = D\{0} or ε = 0 and cone C = D. Also, it is not difficult to prove that, under generalized convexity assumptions, the notion of Benson (q + D, ε)-proper solution of (P), for q / ∈ −D\{0}, coincides with the notion of properly ε-efficient solution with respect to q given by El Maghri in [22] (see [22, Section 2 and Theorem 3.1] and Theorems 2.4 and 2.5).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Remark 2.3 Definition 2.7 reduces to the strong ε-subdifferential concept given by Kutateladze [15] by considering C = {q}, q ∈ D (see also [7]). …”
Section: Definition 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we recall the notion of p-regular ε-subdifferentiability given by El Maghri in [7] (see also [9]), which will be used along the paper.…”
Section: Definition 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations