2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2014.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto iterative learning control: Optimized control for multiple performance objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… where and represent the tracking error and the control signal at the kth iteration, respectively. Lim et al [104] proposed a Pareto learning control framework that integrated multiple indicators into a design framework to improve the multiple performance indicators of the system. Axelsson et al [105] modified the objective function in the optimization problem, extended the norm-optimal ILC algorithm for linear systems, and applied the Kalman filter to linear time-invariant systems.…”
Section: Optimal Controllers and Rectifying Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… where and represent the tracking error and the control signal at the kth iteration, respectively. Lim et al [104] proposed a Pareto learning control framework that integrated multiple indicators into a design framework to improve the multiple performance indicators of the system. Axelsson et al [105] modified the objective function in the optimization problem, extended the norm-optimal ILC algorithm for linear systems, and applied the Kalman filter to linear time-invariant systems.…”
Section: Optimal Controllers and Rectifying Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dai Rong et al [14] proposed an iterative learning identification algorithm based on timevarying neural network, which improved the convergence speed of the algorithm and the identification accuracy of nonlinear time-varying system. Barton et al [15] proposed the Pareto iterative learning control method to discuss the optimization of multiple performance objectives. In terms of the ILC norm optimization theory, Son et al [16] developed an ILC optimization algorithm based on pointto-point robust monotone convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to address the undesirable large transient behavior in the iteration domain, the explicit optimal cost functions were introduced and minimized to design the norm optimal ILC (NOILC) algorithms , and guarantee the monotonic error convergence along the iteration direction. The lifted representation with supervector approach is often used in the design of NOILC . The linear system is reformulated to map the input vector to the output vector with the system matrix, where the initial states are set as straightforward zeros .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently a unified data‐driven design framework has been proposed for optimality‐based general iterative learning control. Different from the NOILCs and MPC‐based ILCs , the proposed approach in does not use any process model information in the controller design but the I/O measurements. However, it is still based on a lifting technique and the control law includes a matrix operation, which leads to a time‐consuming computation because of the increasing matrix dimension with the data points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%