2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3745809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto Optima for a Class of Singular Control Games

Abstract: We study a class of N -player stochastic differential games of singular control, motivated by the study of a dynamic model of interbank lending with benchmark rates. We describe Pareto optima for this game and show how they may be achieved through the intervention of a regulator, whose policy is a solution to a singular stochastic control problem. Pareto optima are characterized in terms of the solution to a new class of Skorokhod problems with piecewise-continuous free boundary.Pareto optimal policies are sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another peculiarity is that this equilibrium induces the players to install before than when they would have done under a Pareto optimum. This is the converse phenomenon of what observed, e.g., in Cont et al (2020), where instead players following a Nash equilibrium act later than players following a Pareto optimum.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another peculiarity is that this equilibrium induces the players to install before than when they would have done under a Pareto optimum. This is the converse phenomenon of what observed, e.g., in Cont et al (2020), where instead players following a Nash equilibrium act later than players following a Pareto optimum.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Remark 5.9 Since, after Remark 4.1, we have c < x, this means that the search for a Nash equilibrium induces the agents to perform an earlier installation with respect to the cooperative behavior of the Pareto optimum seen in the previous section. This phenomenon is the converse of the one observed in Cont et al (2020), where instead the Nash equilibrium's action regions are contained in the Pareto optima's ones, i.e., agents wait more under the Nash equilibrium than under the Pareto optimum. By continuity, we expect a similar behavior also for the case β > 0, at least for low values of β: in other words, also in the case when price impact is present, competitive Nash equilibria will induce players to install earlier than when they would install under a cooperative Pareto optimum.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 84%