1988
DOI: 10.2307/3214437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto processes

Abstract: An autoregressive process ARP(1) with Pareto-distributed inputs, analogous to those of Lawrance and Lewis (1977), (1980), is defined and its properties developed. It is shown that the stationary distributions are Pareto. Further, the maximum and minimum processes are asymptotically Weibull, and the ARP(1) process is shown to be closed under maximization or minimization when the number of terms is geometrically distributed. The ARP(1) process leads naturally to an extremal process in the sense of Lamperti (1964… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, we give explicit closed‐form expressions for γ ( G ) (0), γ ( G ) (−1) and γ ( G ) (+1) in terms of the model parameters σ , p and α , as follows. First, as shown by Yeh et al (), we have EXn=σ0.3emnormalΓ()11αnormalΓ()1+1α=σ0.3emπαcsc()πα. Since F is continuous, we have E F ( X 1 ) = 1/2, and hence, our goal becomes the evaluation of γ(G)(k)=4[]E(X1+kF(X1))σ20.3emnormalΓ()11αnormalΓ()1+1α, reducing the problem to the evaluation of E ( X 1 + k F ( X 1 )). Deferring details of proof to the Appendix, here we discuss the solution and its interpretations relative to the parameters α and p of YARP(III)(1).…”
Section: The Gini Autocovariance Function For a Nonlinear Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…That is, we give explicit closed‐form expressions for γ ( G ) (0), γ ( G ) (−1) and γ ( G ) (+1) in terms of the model parameters σ , p and α , as follows. First, as shown by Yeh et al (), we have EXn=σ0.3emnormalΓ()11αnormalΓ()1+1α=σ0.3emπαcsc()πα. Since F is continuous, we have E F ( X 1 ) = 1/2, and hence, our goal becomes the evaluation of γ(G)(k)=4[]E(X1+kF(X1))σ20.3emnormalΓ()11αnormalΓ()1+1α, reducing the problem to the evaluation of E ( X 1 + k F ( X 1 )). Deferring details of proof to the Appendix, here we discuss the solution and its interpretations relative to the parameters α and p of YARP(III)(1).…”
Section: The Gini Autocovariance Function For a Nonlinear Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we examine the Gini ACV for a nonlinear type of AR process with possibly infinite variance. Yeh et al () introduce, in different notation, a nonlinear AR Pareto process YARP(III)(1) given by Xt=p1/α0.3emXt1,with probabilityp,min{}p1/α0.3emXt1,0.3emεt,with probability1p, where 0 < p < 1, with { ε t } i.i.d. from the Pareto distribution having survival function 1+xμσα1,x0, with the parameters μ , σ > 0 and α > 0 corresponding to location, scale and tail index respectively.…”
Section: The Gini Autocovariance Function For a Nonlinear Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another application of the Gini method is for nonlinear type of AR process with possibly infinite variance. Such a model was introduced by Yeh, Arnold, and Robertson (). Their nonlinear AR Pareto process YARP(III)(1) is given by Xt={p1/αXt1,with probability0.25emp,min{},p1/αXt1εt,with probability0.25em1p, where 0 < p < 1, with { ε t } i.i.d.…”
Section: Gini Autocovariance Function and Nonliner Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%