2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parity among interpretation methods of MLEE patterns and disparity among clustering methods in epidemiological typing of Candida albicans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Boriollo et al . ). It outperforms many of the DNA‐based methods and remains a useful tool for molecular investigation of natural populations of C. albicans (Santos et al .…”
Section: Non‐dna‐based Typing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Boriollo et al . ). It outperforms many of the DNA‐based methods and remains a useful tool for molecular investigation of natural populations of C. albicans (Santos et al .…”
Section: Non‐dna‐based Typing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, MLEE is time‐consuming because it requires the combination of results from at least 10 enzymes to provide reliable typing data and detection of variability among isolates (Boriollo et al . , ).…”
Section: Non‐dna‐based Typing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques are used for molecular characterization of Candida species, such as Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) [41], DNA fingerprinting [42], electrophoretic karyotyping [43], Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [44], Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis (MLEE) [45], and sequencing of microsatellites [46]. However, in order to estimate genetic distances and infer phylogenetic relationships between species that can be easily evaluated in terms of probability models, the most suitable techniques involve gene sequencing and produce topologies built from nucleotide or amino acid sequences.…”
Section: Molecular Methods Developed For the Identification And Charamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the enzyme banding patterns of two isolates differ, such differences are assumed to be DNA based and heritable. MLEE is a reliable technique with a relatively high discriminatory power in the distinction between unrelated strains and shows good reproducibility [30], [31].In the field of medical mycology, isoenzyme typing has shown great potential in studies of taxonomic, systematics, genetics, evolutive, and epidemiologic characterization, especially for the yeast C. albicans [32]. An enzyme reaction can be demonstrated by electrophoretic bands of enzymatic activity in gels, indicating the existence of isoenzymes or isozymes.…”
Section: Methods For Identification Of Candida Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%