2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Park cool island and built environment. A ten-year evaluation in Parque Central, Mendoza-Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between our study and that of Zoulia et al [58] is that they were conducted in different climates and were not the same in the urban context. Coupled with rapid urbanization in China, the development of dense park surroundings has altered the role of parks as cooling regulators, resulting in stronger cooling effects in parks during the day than at night [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difference between our study and that of Zoulia et al [58] is that they were conducted in different climates and were not the same in the urban context. Coupled with rapid urbanization in China, the development of dense park surroundings has altered the role of parks as cooling regulators, resulting in stronger cooling effects in parks during the day than at night [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of urbanization, the impact of buildings on park cooling continues to be tracked. Ruiz et al evaluated the evolution of the cooling effect of the central park and its surrounding built environment in the city of Mendoza, Argentina, over a 10-year period, showing that the densification of the surrounding built environment has increased the thermal inertia of the built environment and the role of parks as thermal regulators; the thermal benefits of the park have changed from being experienced in the evening to the afternoon [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have undertaken extensive studies on urban microclimates to address the corresponding urban overheating challenges, integrating climate-sensitive design strategies into urban design practices (Jun . Current research indicates that various factors significantly influence the outdoor thermal environment, including urban geometry (Jun Yang et al 2021;Omar M et al 2020;Tania Sharmin et al 2017;Mohammad Taleghani et al 2015;Feng Yang et al 2013), the proportion of vegetation and water bodies (MARÍA ANGÉLICA RUIZ et al 2022;Michael A. Allen et al 2021;Jingcheng Xu et al 2010;Liangmei Huang et al 2008), building and road surface materials (A. Ferrari et al 2020; Julie V. Pham et al 2019;Mohammad Taleghani and Umberto Berardi 2018;Afroditi Synnefa et al 2011), and natural ventilation (Yonghong Liu et al 2020;Yueyang He et al 2018;Yujiao Chen et al 2017;R. Rampon and B. Blocken 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platanus hispanica (London Plane trees) and Morus alba (Mulberry trees) are species widely used in the city of Mendoza, both for their size, of 1 st and 2 nd magnitude respectively, and for their shade and ecosystem services of regulation and comfort. In this context, urban trees provide numerous benefits, improving the urban climate, mitigating "heat island" intensity effects in climates with high heliophany; hydrating the atmosphere and reducing summer heat loads with consequent energy savings (22); allowing the retention of suspended particles and noise mitigation by foliage; increasing comfort conditions in public spaces and significantly contributing to urban aesthetics (15). According to dendrochronological analyses carried out in situ (13), the studied specimens show an approximate age of between 90 years (Mulberry trees) and 119 years (London Plane trees), while also showing symptoms of water and thermal stress and some obvious hazard indicators, such as cracks, hollows, and exudates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%