2020
DOI: 10.1002/eng2.12297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parking recommender system privacy preservation through anonymization and differential privacy

Abstract: Recent advancements in the Internet of Things (IoT) have enabled the development of smart parking systems that use services of third‐party parking recommender system to provide recommendations of personalized parking spot to users based on their past experience. However, the indiscriminate sharing of users' data with an untrusted (or semitrusted) parking recommender system may breach the privacy because users' behavior and mobility patterns could be inferred by analyzing their past history. Therefore, in this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…W.A.Amiri et al [44] [45] proposed a smart parking system using blockchain in which the author used cloaking technique to generalize the cars locations into cloaking area to preserve the privacy of the drivers. Some parking service providers have adopted differential privacy such that Y. Saleem et al [24]. However, these systems have a major drawback that they need a third party for data perturbation and rely on a centralized parking management system or server, are prone to SPOF attacks, and face issues like availability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…W.A.Amiri et al [44] [45] proposed a smart parking system using blockchain in which the author used cloaking technique to generalize the cars locations into cloaking area to preserve the privacy of the drivers. Some parking service providers have adopted differential privacy such that Y. Saleem et al [24]. However, these systems have a major drawback that they need a third party for data perturbation and rely on a centralized parking management system or server, are prone to SPOF attacks, and face issues like availability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, where there is no trustworthy third-party service provider, it is essential to examine how to guarantee that private information is not exposed. Some parking service providers have adopted differential privacy [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar study, [27] combined two different approaches: k-anonymity and perturbation techniques to preserve the privacy of users' parking information and mobility pattern in a privacy-preserving parking spot recommender system. The anonymization technique was applied on users' parking information, while users' parking spot request is perturbed, hence making the user indistinguishable.…”
Section: B Privacy-preserving Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel privacy preservation method based on l-diversity and t-closeness was proposed (Sei et al , 2019) that in turn anonymized database with high data quality in a stipulated time interval. Saleem et al (2020) discussed two solutions that preserve privacy using recommender system using differential privacy technique that in turn evolved the tradeoff between privacy and data utility.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%