2020
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10090588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parkinson’s Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale for Evaluating Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The aim of the present systematic review was to examine the evidence on the accuracy and psychometric properties of the Parkinson’s Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS) for evaluating the presence of cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) as well as to highlight the quality and quantity of research available on the use of the PD-CRS in this population. We searched four databases from inception until July 2020. Eight studies, published between 2008 and 2020, met the inclusion criteria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the currently published suggestions for PDD cut-offs are rather inconsistent themselves. 23 In our study, all patients had Parkinson’s disease CRS scores below 73.5/134, which meets the cut-off proposed most recently. 23 Scores are also influenced by educational and socioeconomic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the currently published suggestions for PDD cut-offs are rather inconsistent themselves. 23 In our study, all patients had Parkinson’s disease CRS scores below 73.5/134, which meets the cut-off proposed most recently. 23 Scores are also influenced by educational and socioeconomic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“… 23 In our study, all patients had Parkinson’s disease CRS scores below 73.5/134, which meets the cut-off proposed most recently. 23 Scores are also influenced by educational and socioeconomic parameters. To avoid incorrectly excluding patients, we decided to take a more liberal threshold for this scale (= 81), and cite a review article that discusses these figures in depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In consequence, level 1 scales, such as PD-CRS become relevant in daily practice. PD-CRS is an instrument that was specifically designed for PD cognitive evaluation and assesses cortical and subcortical functions ( Pagonabarraga et al, 2008 ) which have been widely studied in diverse populations ( Pagonabarraga et al, 2008 ; Martínez Martín et al, 2009 ; Fernández de Bobadilla et al, 2013 ; Santangelo et al, 2014 ; Fernández-Bobadilla et al, 2017 ; Samat et al, 2017 ; Serrano-Dueñas et al, 2017 ; Koevoets et al, 2018 ; Tan et al, 2020 ; Mahmoudi Asl et al, 2022 ); unfortunately, studies assessing this instrument’s consistency are heterogeneous in terms of patients’ clinical and sociodemographic characteristics ( Rosca and Simu, 2020 ) and only one study has been carried out on Latin American population ( Serrano-Dueñas et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%