2021
DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PARP inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a review

Abstract: Purpose of review This article will review recent changes in the standard of care for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, as well as ongoing trials evaluating this class of drugs in combination with antiangiogenic agents and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Recent findings Niraparib received FDA approval for use in patients with complete response or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of BRCAm or HRD status that was received in A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 40 Homologous recombination deficiency testing is becoming increasingly common in clinical care as it stratifies patients for maintenance therapy. 41 , 42 However, the intent of this analysis was to compare two different sequences of genetic testing in ovarian cancer, rather than a cost-effectiveness analysis of maintenance therapy options, which has already been published. 43 It is interesting to note that in the aforementioned cost-effectiveness analysis, olaparib must be less than $8,950 USD per month, or $107,400 USD per year, to be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 USD per PFLY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 40 Homologous recombination deficiency testing is becoming increasingly common in clinical care as it stratifies patients for maintenance therapy. 41 , 42 However, the intent of this analysis was to compare two different sequences of genetic testing in ovarian cancer, rather than a cost-effectiveness analysis of maintenance therapy options, which has already been published. 43 It is interesting to note that in the aforementioned cost-effectiveness analysis, olaparib must be less than $8,950 USD per month, or $107,400 USD per year, to be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 USD per PFLY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the importance of the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 has been well documented [35,36]. Genomic tests, such as Myriad myChoice® CDx (Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA), which detects BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutants, have been approved by the FDA and are used to detect biomarkers for PARP inhibitor treatment [37]. Unfortunately, the relationship between CRC and HRD has not yet been fully studied.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, a vast majority of RCTs assessing PARPis as first and second lines that subsequently led to FDA/EMA approvals included patients who were platinum sensitive (evaluated through complete/partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy regimens), thus selecting specific populations that already exhibited a sensitivity profile close to PARPis [ 75 , 76 ].…”
Section: Hrd Evaluation In Clinics: Current Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of frontline treatment, HRD (through MC-CDx) evaluation in PAOLA-1 patients appeared essential to guide treatment with olaparib plus bevacizumab, but niraparib exerted an effect irrespective of HRD status [ 52 , 76 , 77 ]. Interestingly, patients from the PRIMA trial were quite different from those from the PAOLA-1 trial, with more advanced cancer and less complete response.…”
Section: Hrd Evaluation In Clinics: Current Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%