Restudy of the unique diapsid reptile Mesosuchus browni Watson, from the Cynognathus Assemblage Zone (late EarlyTriassic to early MiddleTriassic) of the Burgersdorp Formation (Tarkastad Subgroup; Beaufort Group) of South Africa, con¢rms that it is the most plesiomorphic known member of the Rhynchosauria. A new phylogenetic analysis of basal taxa of Archosauromorpha indicates that Choristodera falls outside of the Sauria, Prolacertiformes is a paraphyletic taxon with Prolacerta sharing a more recent common ancestor with Archosauriformes than with any other clade, Megalancosaurus and Drepanosaurus are sister taxa inthe clade Drepanosauridae within Archosauromorpha, and are the sister group to the clade Tanystropheidae composed of Tanystropheus, Macrocnemus, and Langobardisaurus. Combination of the phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs and their known stratigraphic ranges reveals signi¢cant gaps in the fossil records of Late Permian and Triassic diapsids. Extensions of the temporal ranges of several lineages of diapsids into the Late Permian suggests that more groups of terrestrial reptiles survived the end-Permian mass extinction than thought previously.Keywords: fossil; phylogeny; reptile; South Africa; diapsid; Gondwana apparent immediately to Robert Broom that the skeletons were actually of two distinct, though related, species (Broom 1913a). Broom designated an articulated skeleton with a single external naris and a pair of supposed acrodont premaxillary teeth as the type of Mesosuchus, and the remainder of the specimens were assigned to a new genus and species Euparkeria capensis. Watson's confusion is understandable given that the specimens he examined consisted only of an incomplete skull and articulated postcranium, numerous isolated cranial elements lacking from the single skull, and various parts of the axial and appendicular skeletons that could not be compared readily with the single, imperfect skeleton.As the etymology of the name suggests, Watson (1912a) believed that Mesosuchus was an ancestral crocodile with close a¤nities to other presumed primitive crocodilians such as Proterosuchus, Erythrosuchus and Ornithosuchus. However, it is clear that the data for this opinion were derived from the skeletons of Euparkeria, in particular the slender lower jaw with thecodont implantation, the crocodilian-like ilium, and the construction of the tarsus and pes. Broom (1913a) recognized the great resemblance of Mesosuchus to the diaptosaurian (basal diapsid) reptile Howesia also from the Cynognathus Assemblage Zone near Aliwal North (Broom 1906). He concurred with Watson on the close relationship between Ornithosuchus and Euparkeria. In the same year, Broom (1913b) gave a more detailed description of both Euparkeria and Mesosuchus, rea¤rming the a¤nities between Euparkeria and pseudosuchians, and between Mesosuchus and other rhynchocephalians such as Howesia, Rhynchosaurus and Hyperodapedon.In 1921, the fossil collection of Mr Alfred Brown was purchased by the South African Museum, and a second ...