Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1083356.1083376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parsing and interpreting ambiguous structures in spatial hypermedia

Abstract: When reflecting on information, spatial hypermedia users express their understanding of the information's structure visually. In order to facilitate this process, spatial hypermedia uses spatial parsers that enable systems to infer the structure of information based on the implicit relationships between components of the representation. This paper describes the two main purposes of spatial parsers in spatial hypermedia systems and how particular parsing approaches and features influence their effectiveness and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Logic and cardinality relations can be expressed using implicit relations [7]. Figure 1 gives examples of the different types of implicit relations that can be expressed in ShyWiki.…”
Section: Defining Implicit Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logic and cardinality relations can be expressed using implicit relations [7]. Figure 1 gives examples of the different types of implicit relations that can be expressed in ShyWiki.…”
Section: Defining Implicit Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of knowledge captured in ShyWiki, are the relationships among notes that are represented implicitly using visual and spatial properties. They are implicit graphic knowledge structures that can express some logic and set relations [11].…”
Section: Combination Using Implicit Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, most spatial hypermedia systems have preferred generic spatial parsers that did not used on context-specific heuristics [8,15,19]. This is appropriate when it cannot be assumed that the initial document layout will be meaningful.…”
Section: Spatial Hypermediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navigation bars were mentioned most of the time and usually within the first two steps in the process. However, there were 7 Total interpretation processes = 19*16 = 304 8 Not all pages had a search box differences depending on their location (top, left, or right). Table 12 shows the average order to the navigational bars.…”
Section: Framing and Reference Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%