2020
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parsing the effects of demography, climate and management on recurrent brucellosis outbreaks in elk

Abstract: 1. Zoonotic pathogens can harm human health and well-being directly or by impacting livestock. Pathogens that spillover from wildlife can also impair conservation efforts if humans perceive wildlife as pests. Brucellosis, caused by the bacterium Brucella abortus, circulates in elk and bison herds of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and poses a risk to cattle and humans. Our goal was to understand the relative effects of climatic drivers, host demography and management control programmes on disease dynamics.2.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we only detected B. abortus at three abortions and two live births of 60 promptly sampled events, adding further credence to the limited risk seropositive elk, as a group, may pose. The current focus on managing seropositive elk and their removal to curtail transmission risk may not be as effective as once thought, particularly since positive serostatus is weakly correlated with infectiousness (Cotterill et al 2020). If the greatest risk of shedding occurs with abortion events that typically occur the year after first exposure (Thorne et al 1978), then seropositive elk that were exposed years ago and still retain antibodies may have a degree of immunity to becoming infectious again and may be less susceptible than naïve seronegative elk to having a brucellosis-induced abortion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we only detected B. abortus at three abortions and two live births of 60 promptly sampled events, adding further credence to the limited risk seropositive elk, as a group, may pose. The current focus on managing seropositive elk and their removal to curtail transmission risk may not be as effective as once thought, particularly since positive serostatus is weakly correlated with infectiousness (Cotterill et al 2020). If the greatest risk of shedding occurs with abortion events that typically occur the year after first exposure (Thorne et al 1978), then seropositive elk that were exposed years ago and still retain antibodies may have a degree of immunity to becoming infectious again and may be less susceptible than naïve seronegative elk to having a brucellosis-induced abortion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although abortion is considered the hallmark clinical sign of recent brucellosis infection (Cheville et al 1998), the longer-term reproductive effects and risk of shedding infectious materials are unknown. Studies that try to document active infection through culture of B. abortus from seropositive elk tissues are limited and the correlation between positive serostatus and infectiousness is generally weak (Cotterill et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, culls can comprise a single component of multifaceted management plans. Co-occurring interventions, such as vaccination of humans and domestic animals or food provisioning of wildlife reservoirs, can obscure how culling affects cross-species transmission risk or transmission dynamics in the reservoir ( 10 ). Last, data collected alongside culls are generally restricted to incidence of infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be problematic for ranchers occupying areas near elk populations like the Greater Yellowstone Area. Elk are known reservoirs for brucellosis, (Brucella abortus) a disease that is highly contagious and poses a risk to livestock and humans [8][9][10]. Because of the potential for causing abortion in cattle, the USDA used vaccines and serologic testing to nearly eradicate B. abortus from domestic herds [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%