2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part. A: A review of the real-time sea-state estimation, using wave buoy analogy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictor-corrector filters and observers are widely used for state and parameter estimation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. These filters can be roughly divided into two categories: those aiming for optimal solutions and those focused on maintaining stability [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. One of the most recent filters in the latter category is the Sliding Innovation Filter (SIF) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictor-corrector filters and observers are widely used for state and parameter estimation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. These filters can be roughly divided into two categories: those aiming for optimal solutions and those focused on maintaining stability [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. One of the most recent filters in the latter category is the Sliding Innovation Filter (SIF) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite simplicity and amenability, several downsides are associated with this approach. First, these models are basically constructed based on stationarity or low-order non-stationarity, absolute convergence of Autocovariance Function (ACVF), specific conditions for spectral density, and Gaussian distribution for joint probability distribution density, where the optimal prediction must meet all conditions [9] that cannot be met always in real-world data, i.e., one sea condition to another [13]. For instance, in [12], the predictor failed to capture amplitude precisely above 8s due to non-stationarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%