1982
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/20.2.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part I. A Comparison of Three Different High Pressure Liquid Chromatography Systems for the Determination of Aldehydes and Ketones in Diesel Exhaust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted that impingers fitted with removable vials* could greatly reduce the sampling time and minimize solution spillage [18]. Some difficulties may be experienced in completely removing the absorbing solution when using fritted impingers as compared with plain ones [19]. It is worth mentioning a special type of liquid scrubber that is based on the nebulization/reflux concentration.…”
Section: Midget Impingersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be noted that impingers fitted with removable vials* could greatly reduce the sampling time and minimize solution spillage [18]. Some difficulties may be experienced in completely removing the absorbing solution when using fritted impingers as compared with plain ones [19]. It is worth mentioning a special type of liquid scrubber that is based on the nebulization/reflux concentration.…”
Section: Midget Impingersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the DNPH must be purified by multiple recrystallizations in UV-grade acetonitrile. Commercially precoated DNPH cartridges are most viable to abnormally high formaldehyde concentrations [19,25]. Acetone contamination is apparently unavoidable.…”
Section: Sample Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems also arise in the interpretation of the results from the variety of sampling techniques, testing methods, engines, fuels and combustion conditions and valid comparisons are therefore difficult. In general, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] the concentration of aldehydes in the exhaust gases of petrol driven cars is 10-70ppmv although catalytic exhaust control reduces this to about 1 ppmv or less. For diesel cars concentrations tend to be lower, whereas oxygenated fuels give higher concentrations.…”
Section: Occurrence and Measurement Of Aldehydes In Exhaust Cases Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an acetonitrile solution is used, the contents of the bubbler can be injected directly on the LC. Earlier GC experience with packed columns, which lacked sufficient separation power, sensitivity and inertness, led to the development of HPLC methods [6,13,27,28]. Although HPLC analysis of DNPH-derivatives offers distinct advantages, such as low temperature, rather specific UV detection and normal sample handling and injection techniques, resolution is not high and complete separation of all important carbonyls of automobile exhaust can only be achieved by extensive eluent programming, resulting in long analysis times.…”
Section: Occurrence and Measurement Of Aldehydes In Exhaust Cases Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas chromatography is not ideal for analysis of these hydrazones because they have relatively high boiling points or decompose before vaporization. Therefore, HPLC has been used to analyze these derivatives [4][5][6][7][8]. The sensitivity of HPLC detectors has been relatively low compared with that of GC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%