2010
DOI: 10.5120/1078-1409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part of Speech Taggers for Morphologically Rich Indian Languages: A Survey

Abstract: The problem of tagging in natural language processing is to find a way to tag every word in a text as a particular part of speech, e.g., proper pronoun. POS tagging is a very important preprocessing task for language processing activities. This paper reports about the Part of Speech (POS) taggers proposed for various Indian Languages like Hindi, Punjabi, Malayalam, Bengali and Telugu. Various part of speech tagging approaches like Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Support Vector Model (SVM), Rule based approaches, Ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My work shows the evolution of an easy and effective automatic tagger in support of inflectional and derivational morphologically rich language Hindi. Indian languages are morphologically rich with less linguistically peculiar patterns and rules and heavy annotated corpora and thus the development of POS tagger is a difficult task [6]. POS tagging is a phenomenon of allotting the words in a textual matter as matching to a picky component of speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My work shows the evolution of an easy and effective automatic tagger in support of inflectional and derivational morphologically rich language Hindi. Indian languages are morphologically rich with less linguistically peculiar patterns and rules and heavy annotated corpora and thus the development of POS tagger is a difficult task [6]. POS tagging is a phenomenon of allotting the words in a textual matter as matching to a picky component of speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In suffix Stripping module, they separate the word and the suffix from the surface form, here they make use of suffix stripping algorithm. In the paper by Dinesh Kumar ,Et.al [9],the morphological analyzer accept the input text and it is transliterated to an intermediate representation which is stored as a file. This file used while traversing the FSA.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dinesh Kumar ,Et.al [9] A string is said to be accepted [7] ii. Dinesh Kumar ,Et.al [9] Advanced [6] ii.Vinod P M,Et.al [8] ii. Jisha P Jayan Et.al [15] Removing suffix from word to get the stem word i.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the system is 90.11%. Dinesh Kumar [1] developed part of speech tagger using neural network. This was the first part of speech tagger was developed using Neural Network approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%