2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-008-0557-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial 5p monosomy or trisomy in 11 patients from a family with a t(5;15)(p13.3;p12) translocation

Abstract: A family with six alive patients with partial monosomy 5p and five with partial trisomy 5p due to a t(5;15)(p13.3;p12) translocation is reported. The translocation was present in four generations with eight balanced carriers. This is the first molecular-cytogenetic and clinical study with both syndromes present in the same family. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) probes, the breakpoint was mapped to 5p13.3, in the interval corresponding to the BAC clone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large deletions and unbalanced translocations in CdCS are associated with severe neurological impairment and higher frequency of congenital malformations [Wilkins et al, 1983;Mainardi et al, 2001]. Patients with large deletions, similar to our patients, were reported to have severe intellectual disability, severe speech delay, behavioral problems, and musculoskeletal involvement [de Carvalho et al, 2008;Santo et al, 2016]. Santo at al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Large deletions and unbalanced translocations in CdCS are associated with severe neurological impairment and higher frequency of congenital malformations [Wilkins et al, 1983;Mainardi et al, 2001]. Patients with large deletions, similar to our patients, were reported to have severe intellectual disability, severe speech delay, behavioral problems, and musculoskeletal involvement [de Carvalho et al, 2008;Santo et al, 2016]. Santo at al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The following probes were applied: RP11‐714I4 (chrX:38,470,254–38,631,716), RP11‐34P8 (chrX:73,914,389–74,105,538), RP11‐1072D12 (chr3:95,897,890–96,067,315), CTD‐3225H3 (chrX:29,125,517–29,260,404), RP11‐790H16 (chr19:53,164,395–53,352,424), and RP11‐203K12 (chrX:74,592,669–74,748,513). They were FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) or TRITC (tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate) labeled by nick‐translation and hybridized on metaphase spread [de Carvalho et al, ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FISH analyses were performed according to published protocols [27] in order to confirm chromosome abnormalities, STR and array CGH results. A total of twenty-one bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones (RP11-59C22, RP11-810B19, RP11-473F9, RP11-1029M14, RP11-976O8, RP11-125A21, RP11-241M9, RP11-1122G9, RP11-420J19, RP11-23D12, RP11-349J3, RP11-373F8, RP11-1022E23, RP11-100I1, RP11-1055J13, RP11-428C17, RP11-62K5, RP11-106P5, RP11-318A6, RP11-1005N9, and RP11-876N17) mapping to 5p13.3–p15.32 region and three BAC clones (RP11-1029D4, RP11-916H5, and RP11-945C11) mapping to chromosome 21q21.1–q22.11 were selected from the University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), with detailed corresponding linear map position available in genome (Table 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%