2002
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00768.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Ablations of the Flocculus and Ventral Paraflocculus in Monkeys Cause Linked Deficits in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements and Adaptive Modification of the VOR

Abstract: The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) generates compensatory eye movements to stabilize visual images on the retina during head movements. The amplitude of the reflex is calibrated continuously throughout life and undergoes adaptation, also called motor learning, when head movements are persistently associated with image motion. Although the floccular-complex of the cerebellum is necessary for VOR adaptation, it is not known whether this function is localized in its anterior or posterior portions, which comprise th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
124
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
124
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One was a direct pathway with a gain that accurately matched the head-velocity input to the eye-velocity output at high (>1 Hz) frequencies. Thus, the basic gain of the VOR was not stored in the flocculus itself but in the brainstem (Luebke and Robinson, 1994;McElligott et al, 1998;Rambold et al, 2002). The second component was a leaky integrator with time constant 0.5 s, to be consistent with the observation that after cerebellar inactivation the time constant of postsaccadic drift is longer than that obtained for the plant alone (Carpenter, 1972;Robinson, 1974;Zee et al, 1981;Godaux and Vanderkelen, 1984).…”
Section: Structure Of Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One was a direct pathway with a gain that accurately matched the head-velocity input to the eye-velocity output at high (>1 Hz) frequencies. Thus, the basic gain of the VOR was not stored in the flocculus itself but in the brainstem (Luebke and Robinson, 1994;McElligott et al, 1998;Rambold et al, 2002). The second component was a leaky integrator with time constant 0.5 s, to be consistent with the observation that after cerebellar inactivation the time constant of postsaccadic drift is longer than that obtained for the plant alone (Carpenter, 1972;Robinson, 1974;Zee et al, 1981;Godaux and Vanderkelen, 1984).…”
Section: Structure Of Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The brainstem B, intended to represent the medial vestibular nucleus and nucleus prepositus hypoglossi, had two components (details in Appendix). Their characteristics were intended to match those displayed after lesions of the flocculus in primate (Zee et al, 1981;Rambold et al, 2002). One was a direct pathway with a gain that accurately matched the head-velocity input to the eye-velocity output at high (>1 Hz) frequencies.…”
Section: Structure Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent lesion studies indicate that the ventral paraflocculus contributes to both smooth pursuit and VOR adaptation (Rambold et al 2002). Therefore it is reasonable that visual mossy fiber input to ventral paraflocculus from DLPN plays a role in smooth pursuit but may not necessarily play a role in adaptation of the VOR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One likely target is oculomotoneurons, since cells retrogradely labeled from tracer injections in the oculomotor and abducens nuclei have been found in the region of high calbindin density at the border of PH and VMN (Graybiel and Hartwieg 1974;Gacek 1977;Langer et al 1986). The cerebellar input suggests the possibility that cells receiving that input are brainstem participants in cerebellar-mediated computational or plastic functions (Rambold et al 2002).…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%