2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2011.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial adjustment toward optimal cash holding levels

Abstract: Recognizing that industry and capital market conditions may impede a firm's desire to achieve its targeted cash holding levels, we estimate a dynamic model that allows firms to adjust their cash holding levels over time and find evidence consistent with a trade‐off type behavior in cash holding levels. We estimate a partial adjustment model and find that firms rapidly correct any deviation from their targeted cash levels. A typical firm in our sample closes this gap within two years. Inconsistent with the agen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
54
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
54
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again, the fact that the absolute value of the coefficient (β) is less than 1 suggests that cash balances display mean-reverting properties. This finding is consistent with Opler et al (1999) and Venkiteshwaran (2011). 14…”
Section: Targeting Behavior Of Cash Holdingssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Once again, the fact that the absolute value of the coefficient (β) is less than 1 suggests that cash balances display mean-reverting properties. This finding is consistent with Opler et al (1999) and Venkiteshwaran (2011). 14…”
Section: Targeting Behavior Of Cash Holdingssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We observe that the average cash flow to assets ratio is 4.7%; the average capital expenditure to assets ratio, 5.8%; the average leverage ratio, 23.2%; and average cash flow volatility, 8.7%. These figures are largely consistent with those reported for US firms by Opler et al (1999) and Venkiteshwaran (2011); for EMU and UK firms, by Ferreira and Vilela (2004) and Ozkan and Ozkan (2004); and for Chinese firms, by Alles, Lian, and Xu (2012). Additionally, Table 3 shows that on average, the return on assets (ROA) is 2.3% and Tobin's Q is greater than 1 (1.75).…”
Section: The Data Setsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Se considera que el nivel de efectivo obedece a un proceso de ajuste parcial, por lo cual se asume que cada compañía de la muestra tiene un nivel óptimo de efectivo (Venkiteshwaran, 2011;Bigelli & Sánchez-Vidal, 2012 …”
Section: B Determinación Empírica De Las Relacionesunclassified