2010 International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/socpar.2010.5686424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial approximative set theory: A generalization of the rough set theory

Abstract: The paper presents a generalization of the classical rough set theory, called the partial approximative set theory (PAST). According to Pawlak's rough set theory, the vagueness of a subset of a finite universe U is defined by the difference of its upper and lower approximations with respect to a σ-algebra generated by an equivalence relation on U . There are two most natural ways of the generalization of this idea. In particular, the equivalence relation is replaced by either any other type of binary relations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this membership function we can define the lower approximation (set of elements are surely inside) and the upper approximation (set of elements are possibly inside) of a set. The pair of lower and upper approximation defines a rough set [4,5].…”
Section: Rough Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this membership function we can define the lower approximation (set of elements are surely inside) and the upper approximation (set of elements are possibly inside) of a set. The pair of lower and upper approximation defines a rough set [4,5].…”
Section: Rough Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, not only the pairwise disjoint property but also the covering of the universe are given up. This basically new approach is referred to as partial approximation of sets [5,6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pawlak's answers are 'yes' for both questions (so in his system each object has exactly one property from the given family), whereas covering rough set systems say 'yes' for the first question and no for the second one. A generalization of the theory of rough sets (see in [15], [16]) does not commit itself to answer 'yes' for any mentioned question: It does not suppose either the representations of properties belonging to mentioned family cover the discourse universe or the representations form a pairwise disjoint family of sets. From the approximation point of view the generalization can be considered as a system of partial approximation of sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%