2006 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icu.2006.281578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Channel State Information and Intersymbol Interference in Low Complexity UWB PPM Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of algorithms have been developed recently to address the IFI/ISI mitigation problem for noncoherent UWB-IR. These algorithms focus mainly on equalization [4] and multiple symbol detection (MSD) or maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE) [5], [6]. They either need CSI estimation or heavily rely on the post-detection signal processing, both results receivers with relatively high complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of algorithms have been developed recently to address the IFI/ISI mitigation problem for noncoherent UWB-IR. These algorithms focus mainly on equalization [4] and multiple symbol detection (MSD) or maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE) [5], [6]. They either need CSI estimation or heavily rely on the post-detection signal processing, both results receivers with relatively high complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of UWB detection under ISI has recently been addressed for coherent receivers in [10], which proposes a modified Rake scheme with optimized finger delays and combining weights. As for the non-coherent receivers, instead, [11] designs a family of maximum likelihood (ML) symbol-wise detectors using different levels of CSI and a two-state postdetection ML sequence estimator (SE) with full knowledge of CSI. A nonlinear second-order Volterra system model prompts the development in [13] of algorithms with ISI mitigation capability, such as a MLSE with decision feedback and an adaptive inverse-modeling equalizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several proposals of energy detection receivers where the integration time is adapted [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. There are more sophisticated approaches [6], [17], [18], where the authors take advantage of partial channel state information in general for designing the receiver (and not only adapting the integration time). The work in [6] is very similar to the concept of a channel mask that we use in this article.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%