Partial costs of global climate change adaptation for the supply of raw industrial and municipal water: a methodology and application

Abstract

Despite growing recognition of the importance of climate change adaptation, few global estimates of the costs involved are available for the water supply sector. We present a methodology for estimating partial global and regional adaptation costs for raw industrial and domestic water supply, for a limited number of adaptation strategies, and apply the method using results of two climate models. In this paper, adaptation costs are defined as those for providing enough raw water to meet future industrial and municipal water demand, based on country-level demand projections to 2050. We first estimate costs for a baseline scenario excluding climate change, and then additional climate change adaptation costs. Increased demand is assumed to be met through a combination of increased reservoir yield and alternative backstop measures. Under such controversial measures, we project global adaptation costs of $12 bn p.a., with 83-90% in developing countries; the highest costs are in Sub-Saharan Africa. Globally, adaptation costs are low compared to baseline costs ($73 bn p.a.), which supports the notion of mainstreaming climate change adaptation into broader policy aims. The method provides a tool for estimating broad costs at the global and regional scale; such information is of key importance in international negotiations.

A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas

“…They conclude that for large scale studies it is sufficient to assume 422 linear costs for each metre of heightening, including the initial costs, and therefore we assumed this to 423 be the case for the current study. These cost estimates were then adjusted for all other countries by 424 applying construction index multipliers 48 (based on civil engineering construction costs) to account for 425 differences in construction costs across countries 49 . The empirical investigation of dike costs in Ref.…”

“…Since flood protection is not optimal today and risk will change over time, it may be desirable to 49 increase protection standards in some regions. We explore three "adaptation objectives" -i.e.…”

WATCH: Current Knowledge of the Terrestrial Global Water Cycle

“…Regionally, water demands-for agriculture and domestic/industrial use-already exceed supply (Vö rö smarty et al 2000). This is likely to be exacerbated with increasing population and society's changing water demands, a situation exacerbated by the need to maintain river flows for ecosystem and human services (Bates et al 2008;Strzepek and Boehlert 2010;Ward et al 2010;Vö rö smarty et al 2010). As a result, in many regions water (particularly groundwater) is being exploited in an unsustainable way, leading to long-term declines in groundwater levels (McGuire 2009;Rodell et al 2009).…”

Large-scale water scarcity assessment under global changes: insights from a hydroeconomic framework

“…Some large-scale studies incorporate an economic assessment, by considering the costs of water infrastructure adaptation to climate change Ward et al, 2010) necessary to meet projected demands. Some approaches introduce priorities between water uses, for instance Strzepek et al (2013) use ranking rules (absolute priorities) between uses: domestic and industrial uses are the first in priority, then come irrigation and livestock uses.…”