2019
DOI: 10.1002/jcd.21695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial difference sets and amorphic Cayley schemes in non‐abelian 2‐groups

Abstract: In this paper, we consider regular automorphism groups of graphs in the RT2 family and the Davis‐Xiang family and amorphic abelian Cayley schemes from these graphs. We derive general results on the existence of non‐abelian regular automorphism groups from abelian regular automorphism groups and apply them to the RT2 family and Davis‐Xiang family and their amorphic abelian Cayley schemes to produce amorphic non‐abelian Cayley schemes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many PDSs within the same group were equivalent to each other: among the 48 nonabelian groups, there were 176 inequivalent PDSs. Note that PDSs were already known in some nonabelian groups [5]. Please find the full PDS database and code at 42ABC/Nonabelian-NLST-PDSs-of-order-64-code-data on Github.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Many PDSs within the same group were equivalent to each other: among the 48 nonabelian groups, there were 176 inequivalent PDSs. Note that PDSs were already known in some nonabelian groups [5]. Please find the full PDS database and code at 42ABC/Nonabelian-NLST-PDSs-of-order-64-code-data on Github.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDSs 60 [ 2,12,3,14,4,18,25,61,27,62,35,63,43,44,45,58,59, 60 ], [ 5,6,7,20,30,52,15,56,39,40,46,48,49,50,34,54,23,64 ] 67 [ 7,20,3,37,4,17,18,19,8,25,9,27,51,62,53,55,59, 64 ], [ 5,22,2,12,30,52,14,16,39,40,41,57...…”
Section: Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, comparatively little is known in the case when G is nonabelian. There have been constructions in sporadic cases (see, for instance, [14,15]) and some instances of constructions of infinite families (see [9,10,21]). At the same time, there have been relatively few results dealing with the nonabelian case in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%