2013 13th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/eeeic-2.2013.6737928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial mutual information based algorithm for input variable selection For time series forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooccurrence potential for any given jaguar, in relation to two or more other jaguars, would be the density function of time recordings on the refined time grid where any jaguar is within a set radius (such as 1800 m). The localized mutual information measure could be readily adapted to measure partial mutual information (Darudi et al, 2013 ), where the association between two jaguars is measured while controlling for another jaguar. In both this work and Fontes et al, the interpretations are based solely on observed individuals, and there are still challenges present in interpreting interactions detecting between pairs of jaguars when there are likely other interactions with unobserved individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooccurrence potential for any given jaguar, in relation to two or more other jaguars, would be the density function of time recordings on the refined time grid where any jaguar is within a set radius (such as 1800 m). The localized mutual information measure could be readily adapted to measure partial mutual information (Darudi et al, 2013 ), where the association between two jaguars is measured while controlling for another jaguar. In both this work and Fontes et al, the interpretations are based solely on observed individuals, and there are still challenges present in interpreting interactions detecting between pairs of jaguars when there are likely other interactions with unobserved individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, inefficient or redundant lags may result in poor or complex models. Many optimal lag selection methods fail to perform properly owing to the inherent hypothesis of linearity or intense redundancy between the lags (Darudi et al 2013). In previous studies, autocorrelation analysis of the streamflow series has been commonly employed to identify the optimum lags (e.g., Rezaie-Balf et al 2019).…”
Section: Average Mutual Information (Ami)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unnecessary and redundant features not only use extra memory storage but also raise overfitting problems, wasting computing power, and all the time required for the purpose of training the models. With the use of the partial mutual information (PMI) algorithm [23], redundancy between some features, that look mathematically similar, can be identified. The PMI algorithm calculates only that information between input feature and target output which has not been accounted for the calculation of information between previously selected feature set and output .…”
Section: E Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%