2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial nitrification of high ammonia concentration wastewater as a part of a shortcut biological nitrogen removal process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
73
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
73
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the report of Ciudad et al (2005), an activated sludge reactor is operated under different DO levels, analyzing nitrite accumulation and ammonia removal. Results show that at 1.4 mg DO/l, 75% of nitrite accumulation takes place, with 95% of ammonia removal.…”
Section: Dissolved Oxygen Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the report of Ciudad et al (2005), an activated sludge reactor is operated under different DO levels, analyzing nitrite accumulation and ammonia removal. Results show that at 1.4 mg DO/l, 75% of nitrite accumulation takes place, with 95% of ammonia removal.…”
Section: Dissolved Oxygen Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, new processes such as SHARON and ANAMMOX have been developed to treat wastewater with high nitrogen content and low quantity of biodegradable organic materials (Hellinga et al, 1997;Mulder et al, 1995;Dijkman and Strous, 1999). Aiming at lowering the oxygen demand and reducing or avoiding organic substrate requirement, the newly developed processes are essentially based on partial nitrification of ammonium to nitrite (Galí et al, 2006;Fux et al, 2002;Mosquera-Corral, et al, 2005;Ciudad et al, 2005). To achieve the shortcut of nitrate formation, the potential strategies for the stable nitrite accumulation include the control of operating variables such as pH, hydraulic retention time (HRT), solid retention time (SRT), dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, temperature (Ruiz et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2006;Tseng et al,1998;Bougard et al, 2006), and the screening of different reactor configurations such as SHARON reactor and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) (Fux et al, 2006;Galí et al, 2006;Antileo et al, 2006;Chuang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effect of DO concentration on nitrite accumulation did not attract much attention until the recent emergence of partial nitrification processes. Currently, a number of publications have discussed partial nitrification under various DO concentrations (Ciudad et al, 2005;Ruiz et al, 2006;Bae et al, 2002;Wang and Yang, 2004). The maintenance of DO concentration includes operation and installation cost of air supply equipments and the aeration time influences the capital cost of reactor size and operational cost to a large extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K s (half saturation constant) value of AOB (0.3 mg/L) is lower than that of NOB (1.1 mg/L), which means that AOB will outcompete under DO limitation condition (Wang and Yang, 2004). Some researchers have taken DO concentration around 1.0 mg/L as suitable concentration for nitritation (Ciudad et al, 2005;Ruiz et al, 2006). This value can be quite a specific case due to variation of the oxygen mass transfer efficiency in reactors (Ciudad et al, 2005).…”
Section: Sludge Residence Time (Srt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have taken DO concentration around 1.0 mg/L as suitable concentration for nitritation (Ciudad et al, 2005;Ruiz et al, 2006). This value can be quite a specific case due to variation of the oxygen mass transfer efficiency in reactors (Ciudad et al, 2005).…”
Section: Sludge Residence Time (Srt)mentioning
confidence: 99%