2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial optimal transport for a constant-volume Lagrangian mesh with free boundaries

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalizations of the optimal transport problems have also been investigated. Notably, when the two functions being compared do not have the same mass, this leads to the unbalanced and partial optimal transportation problems [CPSV18, BC19, Lév22], with similar solutions (entropy regularized, sliced, semi‐discrete or dynamical approaches). Similarly, when the two functions live on two different spaces and one only has access to pairwise distances within each of these spaces that need to be matched, the corresponding problem amounts to the Gromov‐Wasserstein problem [Mém11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Generalizations of the optimal transport problems have also been investigated. Notably, when the two functions being compared do not have the same mass, this leads to the unbalanced and partial optimal transportation problems [CPSV18, BC19, Lév22], with similar solutions (entropy regularized, sliced, semi‐discrete or dynamical approaches). Similarly, when the two functions live on two different spaces and one only has access to pairwise distances within each of these spaces that need to be matched, the corresponding problem amounts to the Gromov‐Wasserstein problem [Mém11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical semi‐discrete solvers optimize an energy designed so that, at optimality, the area of each power cell (i.e., the polygonal part of the city going towards its optimal bakery, in the above example) matches the mass of each Dirac (i.e., the amount of bread available at that bakery). This leads to fast, multiscale, implementations in 2‐d [Mér11] and 3‐d [Lév15], or using second order optimization schemes [Lév15, SWS*15, KMT19], and extends to optimal transport on the sphere [CQW*19] or when the masses in the two distributions are different [Lév22]. This is also relatively easy to implement – e.g., as a student project or lab.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In standard optimal transport (2.1), the marginal distributions µ and ν are required to have the same mass. Mathematically, this is quite restrictive and practically, the unbalanced case 1 ⊤ n µ = 1 ⊤ m ν stems from the positive-unlabeled learning [20] and the representation of dynamic meshes for controlling the volume of objects with free boundaries [66].…”
Section: Birkhoff Projection Given Any φ ∈ R N×nmentioning
confidence: 99%