2019
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2018.2840226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Permutation Decoding for Several Families of Linear and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathbb{Z}}_4$ </tex-math> </inline-formula>-Linear Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of strategies have been used in designing decoders for codes over rings, as mentioned in [25]. These include the algebraic (syndrome) decoding approach [26], the lifting decoder technique, introduced in [27] and extended in [28], the coset decomposition approach [29], and the permutation decoding [25,30,31]. Several algebraic decoders of codes over rings were presented in [2,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of strategies have been used in designing decoders for codes over rings, as mentioned in [25]. These include the algebraic (syndrome) decoding approach [26], the lifting decoder technique, introduced in [27] and extended in [28], the coset decomposition approach [29], and the permutation decoding [25,30,31]. Several algebraic decoders of codes over rings were presented in [2,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common approaches for designing decoders for codes over rings include [23] the algebraic (syndrome) decoding of linear codes [24], the lifting decoder technique [25,26], the partitioning of a code into the subcode and its cosets (a.k.a. the coset decomposition approach), introduced by Conway and Sloane in [27] (which works for both linear and nonlinear codes), and the permutation decoding [23,28,29]. Most of the soft decision decoders employ some form of the coset decomposition approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%