2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial photoionization cross sections of C60 and C70: A gas versus adsorbed phase comparison

Abstract: We have performed high resolution measurements of the photoelectrons emitted from the valence shell of C70, in the gas and adsorbed phase on a metal surface, in order to derive branching ratios and the partial photoionization cross sections of the two highest occupied molecular orbitals, HOMO and HOMO-1. The comparison between the two phases and the adsorbed phase shows an interesting and unexpected difference that can be attributed to a small orbital shift in solid C70. Density Functional Theory calculations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This produced HOMO and HOMO-1 to be of 2h (l = 5) and 2g (l = 4) character, respectively, with each having a radial node-a result known from the quantum chemical calculation [20] supported by direct and inverse photoemission spectra [21], and from energy-resolved electron-momentum density measurements [22]. TDLDA predicted oscillatory photoemission cross sections of HOMO and HOMO-1 in C 60 which agreed well with the experiment [23] and with quantum chemical calculations [23,25]. Figure 1 shows very good agreement between measurements and TDLDA ratio of HOMO and HOMO-1 cross sections for the four low-energy oscillations.…”
Section: Essential Details Of the Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This produced HOMO and HOMO-1 to be of 2h (l = 5) and 2g (l = 4) character, respectively, with each having a radial node-a result known from the quantum chemical calculation [20] supported by direct and inverse photoemission spectra [21], and from energy-resolved electron-momentum density measurements [22]. TDLDA predicted oscillatory photoemission cross sections of HOMO and HOMO-1 in C 60 which agreed well with the experiment [23] and with quantum chemical calculations [23,25]. Figure 1 shows very good agreement between measurements and TDLDA ratio of HOMO and HOMO-1 cross sections for the four low-energy oscillations.…”
Section: Essential Details Of the Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Note that comparing the branching ratios between different electronic states intensities between this work and the simulated PES at 14 eV of Gao et al is not straightforward because of the kinetic energy effect on the partial cross sections and the possible presence of autoionization resonances in the TPES. Lastly, a comparison with the measured PES from Korica et al 68 is presented which was collected at 50 eV and compares reasonably well with our TPES in terms of shape and energies although the lower resolution of this spectrum precludes a more precise comparison. For instance, the first band of Korica et al is noticeably shifted to the red by about 400 meV which could either be a resolution effect or due to other experimental issues.…”
Section: Threshold Photoelectron Spectrum (Tpes)supporting
confidence: 71%
“…While weak EX-AFS oscillations in absorption cross sections due to diffraction are nowadays a standard tool for local structure determination in solid state, surface science and biological studies, comparable studies in photoelectron emission in the gas phase are just in their infancy. In fact up to now only two cases have been thoroughly explored: the diatomic homonuclear case, especially N 2 4,11,61,64,69,74,75,77 , after the Cohen-Fano prediction 82 , and the HOMO/HOMO-1 oscillations in C 60 and related systems [86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94] . It is becoming clear, however, that such interference/diffraction patterns are an ubiquitous phenomenon, although more complex in nonsymmetrical molecules and further complicated in the valence shell by mixing of different atomic orbitals (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%