“…The rising gap between supply and demand has prompted the search for sustainable alternatives, such as discarded fish species and fish processing by-products that have been reported to have high nutritional value by Saleh et al (2022) [ 33 ] and Khiari et al (2022) [ 34 ]. From a nutritional standpoint, fish meal produced from discards and processing by-products have been evaluated for the diets of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) [ 35 ], rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) [ 36 , 37 ] red drum ( Sciaenops ocellatus ) [ 38 , 39 ], olive flounder ( Paralichthys olivaceus ) [ 40 ], Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) [ 41 ], kuruma shrimp ( Penaeus japonicus ) [ 42 ], juvenile turbot ( Scophthalmus maximus ) [ 43 ], red seabream ( Pagrus major ) [ 44 , 45 ], juvenile longfin yellowtail ( Seriola rivoliana ) [ 46 ], river catfish ( Hemibagrus nemurus ) [ 47 ], and European seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ) [ 48 ], with promising results for partial and total industrial fish meal substitution. Data from the proximate composition analysis of Mediterranean fish species with relatively low economic value suggest that the nutritional profile is comparable to industrially produced fish meal; therefore, the concept of a fish meal processing chain could present a viable solution for the valorization of discards and fish by-products.…”