1996
DOI: 10.1080/00222939600770621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial revision of the genusFabiaDana, 1851 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Species of Fabia are sexually dimorphic and undergo remarkable morphological changes in their life history (Pearse 1966;Campos 1996). These developmental changes and coupled with sexual dimorphism have led to some authors describing the same species twice (see below ;Campos 1996). Fenucci (1975) discovered one of these mistakes during a study of sexual pairs of specimens livings symbiotically with the bivalve Glycimeris longior (Sowerby, 1832).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Species of Fabia are sexually dimorphic and undergo remarkable morphological changes in their life history (Pearse 1966;Campos 1996). These developmental changes and coupled with sexual dimorphism have led to some authors describing the same species twice (see below ;Campos 1996). Fenucci (1975) discovered one of these mistakes during a study of sexual pairs of specimens livings symbiotically with the bivalve Glycimeris longior (Sowerby, 1832).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found that the morphology of the female concurred with F. insularis Melo, 1971, while the male agreed with Pinnotheres emiliai Melo, 1971. Fenucci (1975 accordingly synonymized both species and his conclusions were later followed by Campos (1996). Martins & D'Incao (1998), as well as Melo (1998), Boschi et al (1992) and Bezerra et al (2006), subsequently revalidated both Melo's species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Phylogeny and classification of the pinnotherids have been the aim of many revisions based on adults and larvae morphology and DNA sequences (Ahyong and Ng 2007;Campos 1996aCampos , b, 2009Griffith 1987;Marques and Pohle 1995;Palacios-Theil et al 2009;Pohle and Marques 1998). Particularly, the genera Calyptraeotheres and Tumidotheres have been the focus of debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%