2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0196-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial thickness corneal tissue as a patch graft material for prevention of glaucoma drainage device exposure

Abstract: BackgroundTo protect from erosion of the tube in glaucoma drainage device (GDD), the tube is covered by a biologic tissue which is roofed by the conjunctiva. Sclera, pericardium, dura mater and cornea are available as a patch graft. Drawbacks of some of these materials may include high cost and poor appearance. The purpose of this study is to report the long-term outcomes of partial thickness corneal grafts to cover the tube and prevent its exposure, in GDD surgeries.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As is known, the corneal patch graft provides good biocompatibility and strength, and compared with the scleral patch graft, it is thin and transparent, and thus cosmetically superior. 1 , 10 The stromal lenticule, significantly, is even thinner than the corneal patch graft (100 vs. 300 μm), and showed good strength in the present study. Moreover, the lenticule offers good accessibility: the corneal patch graft and the other patch grafts are difficult to obtain, which procedure is charged to the patient, whereas the lenticule is easily extracted by SMILE surgery and can be performed inexpensively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…As is known, the corneal patch graft provides good biocompatibility and strength, and compared with the scleral patch graft, it is thin and transparent, and thus cosmetically superior. 1 , 10 The stromal lenticule, significantly, is even thinner than the corneal patch graft (100 vs. 300 μm), and showed good strength in the present study. Moreover, the lenticule offers good accessibility: the corneal patch graft and the other patch grafts are difficult to obtain, which procedure is charged to the patient, whereas the lenticule is easily extracted by SMILE surgery and can be performed inexpensively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…In our study, there were three conjunctival erosions in the cornea graft group; this was an erosion rate of 10.34%, which was higher than that reported by Wigton et al (1.9%), Spierer et al (2.2%), and Ekici et al (1.8%). [ 24 26 27 28 ] We used split-thickness donor cornea allografts from the eye bank. Review of patient records indicate that two of the three conjunctival erosions occurred over an area that was not covered by the cornea allograft because the diameter of the graft was smaller than the length of the tube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding pericardial grafts in another study, the exposure rate was 16% with single-thickness processed pericardium in 31 eyes compared to 0% in 59 eyes covered with double-thickness processed pericardium ( p = 0.0002) [ 12 ]. A separate study looking at corneal patch grafts in 45 eyes noted a tube exposure frequency of 2.2% [ 13 ], while another looking at VisionGraft gamma-irradiated cornea had an exposure rate of 1.8% in 169 eyes [ 14 ]. The sample sizes of the latter studies were far smaller than that of the first study, which suggests a slight advantage for SPG in regards to tube exposure, but it is reasonable to believe that double-thickness processed pericardium and gamma-irradiated cornea may also reduce risk of exposure and possible subsequent infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%