1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1997)63:2<291::aid-qua2>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial third-order quasiparticle theory: An application to the photoelectron spectrum of S-tetrazine

Abstract: An alternative choice of reference state averages in electron propagator theory and retention of all self-energy terms through third-order gives rise to the partial third-order self-energy approximation, P3. Quasiparticle P3 calculations avoid the chief computational Ž . bottlenecks of third-order theory and the outer valence Green's function OVGF . P3 requires no multiplicative factors for scaling self-energy terms and produces better accuracy than OVGF. An application to the photoelectron spectrum of s-tetra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same applies to the superoperator algebra ,, and to the Dyson–Gell-Mann–Low time-dependent perturbation theory derivation. , Second, GF theory is based on the Dyson equation (not the Schrödinger equation), and its formulation does not explicitly refer to wave functions, which a determinant-based algorithm stores and manipulates. Whereas two of the authors as well as others implemented partial and full third-order and partial and full fourth-order self-energies , both within the GF and EOM frameworks, higher-order GF methods are yet to be developed and detailed knowledge about convergence is lacking. To obtain these, a general-order implementation, which can generate reliable reference data up to high orders, is paramount in view of the fact that there are many more diagrams in the n th-order GF (GF n ) method than in the n th-order MP (MP n ) method (e.g., 18 Hugenholtz diagrams in GF3 versus three in MP3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same applies to the superoperator algebra ,, and to the Dyson–Gell-Mann–Low time-dependent perturbation theory derivation. , Second, GF theory is based on the Dyson equation (not the Schrödinger equation), and its formulation does not explicitly refer to wave functions, which a determinant-based algorithm stores and manipulates. Whereas two of the authors as well as others implemented partial and full third-order and partial and full fourth-order self-energies , both within the GF and EOM frameworks, higher-order GF methods are yet to be developed and detailed knowledge about convergence is lacking. To obtain these, a general-order implementation, which can generate reliable reference data up to high orders, is paramount in view of the fact that there are many more diagrams in the n th-order GF (GF n ) method than in the n th-order MP (MP n ) method (e.g., 18 Hugenholtz diagrams in GF3 versus three in MP3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44][45] It can be further extended to include frequency dependence [46][47][48] and electron-correlation effects. [49][50][51] What may add to the mysterious appearance of MBGF is the fact that the highest perturbation order of its methods developed so far is only three 15,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] or four, 20,54,64,65 the latter case using simplifying approximations. This is in contrast with CI, 66,67 CC, [68][69][70][71][72] or MBPT, 73,74 all of which can be carried out at any arbitrary high order using the determinant-based algorithm of full configuration interaction (FCI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addition of the third-order terms (EP3 and ΔMP3 methods) lead quite often to the opposite trend in results. Thus, in order to obtain qualitatively good predictions, one is forced to use more advanced, but at the same time computationally more demanding, approximations such as the outer valence Green’s function (OVGF) or P3 method . However, to perform calculations for large molecular systems in a reasonable time, it is necessary to use simple and computationally efficient methods, which are at the same time accurate enough to lead to correct predictions (good speed/quality ratio).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%