2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(03)00285-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial wetting of chemically patterned surfaces: The effect of drop size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
186
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
12
186
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of dynamic droplet volume variation has received some attention over the last few decades, both experimentally [28][29][30] and analytically-computationally, [31][32][33][34] which the droplet is kept fixed at a specific point on the surface, hence not allowing for any possible horizontal motion of the droplet. In this sense, the bifurcation diagram we present…”
Section: -17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of dynamic droplet volume variation has received some attention over the last few decades, both experimentally [28][29][30] and analytically-computationally, [31][32][33][34] which the droplet is kept fixed at a specific point on the surface, hence not allowing for any possible horizontal motion of the droplet. In this sense, the bifurcation diagram we present…”
Section: -17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the Wenzel and Cassie equations apply to surfaces whose protrusions and/or heterogeneities are small in comparison with the size of liquid/ vapor interface. 36,42 If liquid does not penetrate into surface protrusions and is present on the air pockets or placed over a porous material such as fabric, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical importance of the triple line in the wetting behavior was shown by Gao and McCarthy [23], who found experimentally that CA of a droplet is defined solely by the triple line, while the roughness beneath the droplet is irrelevant. However, there are still many controversies regarding the conclusion of Gao and McCarthy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…But, even when the relative size of heterogeneities is very small, the droplet assumes an asymmetric irregular shape with the corrugated three-phase contact line (triple line) [13,14,[18][19][20], especially for the inhomogeneities represented by linear grooves, where the droplet behavior in parallel and perpendicular directions to the grooves is different [21]. However, if the size of inhomogeneities remains small as compared to the droplet size (micro-roughness), the corrugation of the triple line due to imperfections of the solid surface does not produce a significant discrepancy between measured CAs and those predicted by the Wenzel equation [14][15][16][17][22][23][24][25]. On the other hand, with a decrease in the droplet size relative to the size of surface roughness features, the predictive applicability of the Wenzel equation has often been observed to fail [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%