2018
DOI: 10.1101/257923
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partially Overlapping Brain Networks for Singing and Cello Playing

Abstract: 14 Abstract 15This research uses an MR-Compatible cello to compare functional brain activation 16 during singing and cello playing within the same individuals to determine the extent to 17 which arbitrary auditory-motor associations, like those required to play the cello, co-opt 18 functional brain networks that evolved for singing. Musical instrument playing and 19 singing both require highly specific associations between sounds and movements. 20Because these are both used to produce musical sounds, it is oft… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since similar networks appear to be active across studies, we conclude that the dorsal stream has a general capacity for action-sound mapping. This conclusion is also consistent with recent data showing that cello playing and singing engage similar brain networks (38). These findings therefore highlight the auditory-motor coupling (4,16,39,40) that develops during music learning.…”
Section: Auditory-to-motor Dorsal Stream As a Canonical Neural Substratesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since similar networks appear to be active across studies, we conclude that the dorsal stream has a general capacity for action-sound mapping. This conclusion is also consistent with recent data showing that cello playing and singing engage similar brain networks (38). These findings therefore highlight the auditory-motor coupling (4,16,39,40) that develops during music learning.…”
Section: Auditory-to-motor Dorsal Stream As a Canonical Neural Substratesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, every movement specifically stimulates a corresponding somatosensory region in S1 (Giraud and Poeppel, 2012;Schomers and Pulvermuller, 2016), which is intrinsically connected to ipsilateral M1 and IPL (Borich et al, 2015;Bouchard et al, 2013), involves the thalamus (Ackermann and Riecker, 2010;Hwang et al, 2017), and becomes tightly associated with corresponding auditory-motor transformations (Ito et al, 2016;Ito andOstry, 2010, 2012;Ito et al, 2015;Ito et al, 2009). Moreover, M1 sends its strongest subcortical projections to the putamen (Simonyan and Horwitz, 2011), which shows increased activations in more proficient singers (Kleber et al, 2010;Segado et al, 2018;Zarate and Zatorre, 2008).…”
Section: Insula Connectivity As a Function Of Accumulated Singing Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the typical limitations of any case report, such as the inability to truly establish a causal relationship between the method and outcome, application of this paradigm is limited to preserving the components of musical reception and expression, as well as the “imagination” of both receptive and expressive music within our fMRI paradigms. However, other studies have looked at mapping the cortical regions important for playing piano, violin, and saxophone and found quite similar patterns of neural activation as seen with singing a melody [13, 19, 20], suggesting a potentially broader application for this paradigm. An additional caveat to consider is that our assessment of the emotional components of music was limited by the songs that were selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%