2005
DOI: 10.1007/11600930_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partially-Specified Large Games

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We borrow the name of structural robustness from Kalai (2005Kalai ( , 2006, where similar changes in the underlying games are considered and used to study the robustness of Nash equilibria in large games.…”
Section: Structural Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We borrow the name of structural robustness from Kalai (2005Kalai ( , 2006, where similar changes in the underlying games are considered and used to study the robustness of Nash equilibria in large games.…”
Section: Structural Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion above says that after any change in the game that does not affect the essential collection for SE, Γ, and b, the outcome of b remains a SE outcome in the modified game; no further calculation is needed, regardless of the actual payoffs of the modified game. On the other hand, suppose that b is just a WPBE but not a SE, then, since the latter changes might have affected the corresponding essential collection for WPBE (which is J u l y 6 , 2 0 1 1 S u b m i s s i o n 5.2.2 Partially-specified games As also discussed in Kalai (2005Kalai ( , 2006, the idea of structural robustness is very related to the possibility of dealing with partially-specified games. Let G p = (Γ, h) be a partially-specified game, i.e., it lacks of a full description of Γ or some payoffs are unknown.…”
Section: Structural Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anonymous games comprise a broad and well studied class of games (see e.g. [4,5,16] for recent work on this subject by economists) which are of special interest to the Algorithmic Game Theory community, as they capture important aspects of auctions and markets, as well as of Internet congestion.…”
Section: Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a problem of interest is shown to be intractable, more modest goals are pursued: One seeks to solve important special cases of the problem, or to solve them approximately. That is what we accomplish in this paper: we identify a very broad and significant special class of games, the anonymous games studied in the past (see [Mil96,Blo99,Blo05,Kal05] and the definition below), and develop algorithms for finding approximate Nash equilibria in such games. By "approximate Nash equilibrium" we mean a strategy profile in which each player cannot improve her lot by more than a fixed amount denoted .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
AbstractWe study from an algorithmic viewpoint anonymous games [Mil96,Blo99,Blo05,Kal05]. In these games a large population of players shares the same strategy set and, while players may have different payoff functions, the payoff of each depends on her own choice of strategy and the number of the other players playing each strategy (not the identity of these players).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%