2017
DOI: 10.1080/15332691.2017.1372835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participant Perceptions of Relationship Education Programs Adapted for Same-Sex Couples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have adapted relationship interventions for FSG couples. The Strengthening Same-Sex Relationships (SSSR) program for female couples—which focused primarily on reducing negative, destructive communication patterns—was successful in improving relationship quality among participants (Whitton, Scott, & Weitbrecht, 2017). The current study builds theoretical support for why these programs may have positive effects on relationship outcomes (Whitton, Scott, & Dyar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies have adapted relationship interventions for FSG couples. The Strengthening Same-Sex Relationships (SSSR) program for female couples—which focused primarily on reducing negative, destructive communication patterns—was successful in improving relationship quality among participants (Whitton, Scott, & Weitbrecht, 2017). The current study builds theoretical support for why these programs may have positive effects on relationship outcomes (Whitton, Scott, & Dyar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These expressed preferences for sharing vulnerable emotions and positive exchanges were incorporated into a recent relationship education program specifically designed for and successfully piloted on a sample of FSG couples (Whitton, Scott, Dyar, et al, 2017). In qualitative follow-up interviews and program satisfaction questionnaires, participants reported these adaptations to communication skills units were affirming and helpful (Whitton, Scott, & Weitbrecht, 2017) and give reason to question whether the negativity effect will function similarly in FSG relationships, or alternatively, may suggest that there could be a positivity effect in this population. Quantitative, observational studies are necessary to more thoroughly evaluate how communication patterns manifest in these relationships and their subsequent association with relationship quality outcomes.…”
Section: Communication In Fsg Couplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the lowest ratings were for the units on building social support and sex. Accordingly, we have begun refining these content areas, informed by qualitative feedback from participants (described in Whitton, Scott, & Weitbrecht, 2017). We added more specific, detailed information and skills to the building support unit, including lists of local LGBT-friendly gathering places, organizations, religious institutions, and social events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gains in increased positive and decreased negative communication were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Program satisfaction ratings were high with participants reporting appreciation that the program was designed for same-sex couples and citing preference for continued specialized programming for SM women and SM men, respectively (Whitton, Scott, & Weitbrecht, 2018). In sum, although there is a paucity of research in tailoring couple therapy for same-sex couples, emerging research from relationship education programs suggests that culturally tailored couple care is feasible, acceptable, and desired by couples.…”
Section: Initial Findings From Same-sex Relationship Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%