2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2017.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participant Selection for Short-term Collaboration in Open Multi-agent systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, several works on MAS have focused on the possibility that agents may join or leave the network. For example, in [4], the problem of adaptive coalition formation is considered; in [5] the authors develop a trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems; [6] presents an OMAS gossiping framework; the works in [7], [8] focus on the ability of agents in an OMAS setting to form short-term teams; in [9] the stability of gradient descent for OMAS is discussed. Notably, consensus and, in particular, average consensus, represents a popular topic in the context of OMAS, and several distributed consensus algorithms that explicitly account for agents that may join or leave the network have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several works on MAS have focused on the possibility that agents may join or leave the network. For example, in [4], the problem of adaptive coalition formation is considered; in [5] the authors develop a trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems; [6] presents an OMAS gossiping framework; the works in [7], [8] focus on the ability of agents in an OMAS setting to form short-term teams; in [9] the stability of gradient descent for OMAS is discussed. Notably, consensus and, in particular, average consensus, represents a popular topic in the context of OMAS, and several distributed consensus algorithms that explicitly account for agents that may join or leave the network have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-agent collaboration mainly refers to the collaboration of two or more individuals to achieve the same goal. Among them, each individual will influence and cooperate with each other [34]. The synergy can break the barriers of different subjects in multiagent collaboration and achieve a win-win in a real sense [35].…”
Section: Multi-agent Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Golpayegani et al [34] described a collaborative P-MCTS CP (MCTS) model for electric cars, through consultation to actively influence the planning process, to solve their own conflicts, and use the consultation process of collective knowledge to optimize the final consumption patterns; the results show that during the rush hour, there is an obvious load transfer, and the load curve is more smooth, increasing the fees of fairness and flexibility. Hammes et al [56] showed that civil buildings produce a large amount of garbage every year, which can be recycled through reverse logistics.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Multi-agent Collaboration and Logis...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use MAS, where agents coordinate their behaviour and work together to achieve a shared goal through collaboration (Golpayegani et al, 2018). The goal here is to obtain a solution using scalability, in the aim to mitigate risk of unload.…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%