2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10708-020-10147-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participants’ livelihoods compatible with conservation programs: evidence from China’s grain-for-green program in northern Shaanxi Province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, rapid urbanization and decreased AFHF employees mean that more and more rural populations migrated to cities and fewer people were engaged in agricultural activities which may decrease human disturbance (such as animal husbandry and forage collection), thereby reducing the stress of the countryside areas within the Loess Plateau and promoting the vegetation growth (Figures 13a–13d and 14a–14d). Meanwhile, stimulated by a series of ecological conservation programs (Figure 15), Grain for Green program, in particular, farmers have switched livelihood activities dominated by subsistence farming into off‐farm activities such as migrant labor and rural business or high market‐oriented horticulture/orchard farming (Dang et al, 2020) and few people were intent on destroying vegetation that has been restored (Yin et al, 2014). Furthermore, economic development and industrialization may also play important role in enhancing farm household income and reducing the pressure on the land‐system to provide livelihoods (Figures 15c and 15d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, rapid urbanization and decreased AFHF employees mean that more and more rural populations migrated to cities and fewer people were engaged in agricultural activities which may decrease human disturbance (such as animal husbandry and forage collection), thereby reducing the stress of the countryside areas within the Loess Plateau and promoting the vegetation growth (Figures 13a–13d and 14a–14d). Meanwhile, stimulated by a series of ecological conservation programs (Figure 15), Grain for Green program, in particular, farmers have switched livelihood activities dominated by subsistence farming into off‐farm activities such as migrant labor and rural business or high market‐oriented horticulture/orchard farming (Dang et al, 2020) and few people were intent on destroying vegetation that has been restored (Yin et al, 2014). Furthermore, economic development and industrialization may also play important role in enhancing farm household income and reducing the pressure on the land‐system to provide livelihoods (Figures 15c and 15d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the improvement of farming yield depends largely on the input of agricultural production materials such as chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and mulch. For example, the excessive and irrational use of fertilizers, pesticides and mulch can cause agricultural surface pollution and exacerbate the problem of declining arable land quality, thus creating a vicious cycle of increased reliance on fertilizers, pesticides and mulch for agricultural production inputs [31,32]. In addition, irrational irrigation methods, such as heavy irrigation the imbalance focus on the use of land rather than the maintenance of land are also important causes of increased arable land degradation [33].…”
Section: Theoretical Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%