Participants’ views and experiences from setting up a shared patient portal for primary and specialist health services- a qualitative study

Abstract

Background Recently, there has been an increasing focus among healthcare organisations on implementing patient portals. Previous studies have mainly focussed on the experiences of patient portal use. Few have investigated the processes of deciding what content and features to make available, in particular for shared portals across healthcare domains. The aim of the study was to investigate views on content and experiences from the configuration process among participants involved in setting up a shared patient portal for primary and specialist health services. Methods A qualitative study including 15 semi-structured interviews with persons participating in patient portal configuration was conducted from October 2019 to June 2020. Results Whether a shared patient portal for all the health services in the region should be established was not questioned by any of the informants. It was experienced as a good thing to have numerous participants present in the discussions on configuration, but it also was said to increase the complexity of the work. The informants considered a patient portal to be of great value for patient care, among other things because it would lead to improvements in patient follow-up and increased patient empowerment. Nevertheless, some informants advocated caution as they thought the patient portal possibly could lead to an increase in healthcare providers’ workloads and to anxiety and worries, as well as to inequality in access to health care among patients. The findings were categorized into the themes ‘A tool for increased patient involvement’, ‘Which information should be available for the patient’, ‘Concerns about increased workload’, ‘Too complex to use versus not interesting enough’, ‘Involving all services’ and ‘Patient involvement’. Conclusions Establishing a shared patient portal for primary and specialist health services was considered unproblematic. There was, however, variation in opinions on which content and features to include. This variation was related to concerns about increasing the workload for health care providers, causing anxiety and inequality among patients, and ensuring that the solution would be interesting enough to adopt.

Why are Patient Portals Important in the Age of COVID-19? Reflecting on Patient and Team Experiences From a Toronto Hospital Network

“…While patient portals continue to be implemented within health systems across North America, the use of these portals for care delivery remains inconsistent, where the level of integration within clinic workflows varies across health organizations and even clinics within a health organization ( 13 ). Additionally, reporting on the impact of portals on patient experience and perception of quality of care is limited and predominately qualitative (ie, interview) data ( 14 ,– 16 ). Moreover, while these platforms have become a key mechanism for supporting the management of the pandemic, there is a lack of evidence and data about the adoption and use of portals over the last 18 months in the Canadian setting.…”

Ethical and Information Governance Considerations for Promoting Digital Social Interventions in Primary Care

“…Patients, for example, might increasingly use digital interventions as partial surrogates for information and support that they would have otherwise obtained from HCPs, thereby resulting in fewer interactions and weaker mutual bonds with HCPs. Conversely, participation in an OHC or social media platforms or engagement with digital interventions (in general) might trigger patient queries and requests for subsequent contact with HCPs; hence, promotion of online peer support may end up constituting an extra, time-consuming task for HCPs [ 20 , 50 , 51 ]. This is important, bearing in mind the increasing workload of clinicians in the UK primary care setting.…”

Assessing patient readiness for a patient portal implementation in the UAE

“…Some physicians have expressed concerns about using patient portals, including causing distress to patients, misunderstandings and increased physician workloads (Huvila et al , 2021; Nøst et al , 2021). However, some studies have reported that patients understood the health information and found it to be useful (Leveille et al , 2020), while others found that patient portals can reduce patients’ anxiety and stress (Kruse et al , 2015; Nøst et al , 2021).…”