“…A number of approaches have been used to mitigate the negative consequences of being a member of a large class. This includes discussions of the pedagogical benefits and assessment of IT (de Arriba, 2017; Maringe & Sing, 2014; Mtshali, Maistry, & Govender, 2015; Saunders & Hutt, 2015; Schaffer, Young, Ligon, & Chapman, 2017), MOOCs (Maringe & Sing, 2014), lecture capture (Freeman, 1998; Owston, Lupshenyuk, & Wideman, 2011), supplementary media (Saunders & Hutt, 2015), student-response systems (Hancock, 2010; Heaslip, Donovan, & Cullen, 2014; Mayer et al, 2009; Patterson, Kilpatrick, & Woebkenberg, 2010), peer-teaching and peer-assessment (Asikainen et al, 2014), and flipped classrooms (Eichler & Peeples, 2016). However, much of the evaluation of such programs is conducted from the perspective of the provider and few include detailed qualitative accounts that explore the nuances of how the mode of assessment has affected the learner and the experience of learning (Cullen & Turnbull, 2005).…”