The SAGE Handbook of Sports Economics 2019
DOI: 10.4135/9781526470447.n40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation and Demonstration Effects: ‘Couch Potatoes to Runner Beans'?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show, for the total of the sports analysed, that there is an increase in terms of frequency of participation, with a total of 336,000 individuals who have increased their frequency, while there was not a significant increase in the number of low-frequency participants of these sports. This is supported by previous studies that argued that the Olympic Games are more likely to boost sport participation frequency and re-engagement of lapsed participants in regular participation, than to increase the number of new sport participants with low frequency [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 22 , 30 , 31 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show, for the total of the sports analysed, that there is an increase in terms of frequency of participation, with a total of 336,000 individuals who have increased their frequency, while there was not a significant increase in the number of low-frequency participants of these sports. This is supported by previous studies that argued that the Olympic Games are more likely to boost sport participation frequency and re-engagement of lapsed participants in regular participation, than to increase the number of new sport participants with low frequency [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 22 , 30 , 31 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Recently, Kokolakakis et al (2019) have showed an increase in the percentage of the population that participated at least three times a week in the year immediately after the Games [ 22 ]. This result corroborates previous arguments about the legacy being less relevant to new participants than to existing participants who as a result increase their participation [ 8 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Evidence of this notion is found in Kokolakakis et al (2019) where the most significant changes in participation around the London Olympic Games were associated with participants already participating in sport intensively. Dawson (2019) also provides a review of the trickle-down effect and, like , argues that it is likely to be valid only in terms of increasing the frequency of participation of existing participants and also in 'typically less active individuals' such as females and ethnic minorities. The idea that particular sections of the population are more inclined to experience the trickle-down effect is also supported by Frawley and Cush (2011) who showed that club registrations of adults and juniors in Australia, following the 2003 Rugby World Cup, increased by 5% and 20% respectively.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%